Paragraph

 1 1 |                       and usual domain is the argument that turns upon names only.
 2 3 |               answerer, in consequence of the argument, to use an ungrammatical
 3 4 |                    the false appearance of an argument which depend on language
 4 4 |                      fifty a hundred men".~An argument depending upon accent it
 5 5 |                       absolutely, e.g. in the argument "If what is not is the object
 6 5 |                        Likewise also with any argument that turns upon the point
 7 5 |                     reasoning; e.g. Melissus’ argument, that the universe is eternal,
 8 5 |                      cause is inserted in the argument, as though the refutation
 9 6 |                     refutation is a proof, an argument which argued per accidens
10 6 |                     Or again, as in Melissus’ argument, a man assumes that to "
11 8 |                 conclusion to follow from the argument (the argument ad impossible)
12 8 |                 follow from the argument (the argument ad impossible) and that
13 10|                       is failure to direct an argument against the thought except
14 10|                   same thing as to direct the argument against the expression.
15 10|               supposing it to be one, and the argument is to the effect that "All
16 10|                       two separate classes of argument. For, in the first place,
17 10|                      is possible for any such argument as bears more than one meaning
18 10|                   next it is possible for any argument whatsoever; for the fact
19 10|                      not in the nature of the argument, but in the special attitude
20 10|                 towards them, but because the argument itself involves the asking
21 10|                       merely apparent. In the argument that speaking of the silent
22 10|                      not in the proof; in the argument that one can give what one
23 10|                      it lies in the proof. An argument that does not fail in either
24 10|                       to the point whence our argument digressed, are mathematical
25 10|                  questioner here directed his argument against the thought of the
26 10|              questioner here has directed his argument against his thought! Or
27 10|                      that it was, has not his argument been directed against the
28 10|                      of the answerer? Yet his argument is supposed to be one of
29 10|                   else but this will didactic argument be? For it will make manifest
30 10|                      didactic and dialectical argument, and of the fact that while
31 11|                       things is a contentious argument, and any reasoning that
32 11|                   reasoning, is a contentious argument: for it is merely apparent
33 11|                    same motives: and the same argument will be sophistical and
34 11|                      reality. The contentious argument stands in somewhat the same
35 11|                      the art of geometry, the argument which is subordinate to
36 11|                   contentious: and the former argument cannot be adapted to any
37 11|                   latter can be adapted as an argument against all the number of
38 11|                      the circle. Or again, an argument which denied that it was
39 11|                     dinner, because of Zeno’s argument, would not be a proper argument
40 11|               argument, would not be a proper argument for a doctor, because Zeno’
41 11|                      a doctor, because Zeno’s argument is of general application.
42 11|                   relation of the contentious argument to the dialectical were
43 11|                   geometrician, a contentious argument upon the aforesaid subjects
44 11|                     as it is, the dialectical argument is not concerned with any
45 11|                   anything, nor is it even an argument such as we find in the general
46 12|                      fallacy, and drawing his argument into paradox-for this was
47 12|                     come about because of the argument: whereas this is what his
48 12|                  widest range of common-place argument for leading men into paradoxical
49 14|                     must try to construct our argument out of the aforesaid inflections.~
50 15|                 whether one has more than one argument leading to the same conclusion,
51 15|                    against contrary lines, of argument. In general, all the methods
52 15|                       purposes of contentious argument: for the object of concealment
53 15|                    they suppose to help one’s argument, one should put the question
54 15|                     of the premisses of one’s argument, either a refutation or
55 15|                   should also break off their argument and cut down their other
56 16|                    not the same thing take an argument in one’s hand and then to
57 16|                    which the connexion of the argument depends, we still are at
58 16|                    are at a loss to split the argument apart.~
59 17|                     he may have addressed his argument to the very same point as
60 17|                      going to suppose that an argument which turns upon ambiguity
61 17|                      himself, at any rate his argument looks as though it had been
62 17|                    was the point on which the argument turned, they often find
63 17|                 defences one must pass to the argument that the conclusion has
64 18|                    those who wish to solve an argument should in the first place
65 18|                 difference between solving an argument when being subjected to
66 19|                       was not the goal of the argument but only its support. At
67 20| being-beaten-with-my-eyes". Also there is the argument of Euthydemus proving "Then
68 20|               questioner, but not against his argument.~
69 21|                   made up; e.g. the following argument. "Is ou katalueis a house?" "
70 22|             expression; e.g. in the following argument: "Is it possible to be doing
71 22|                       expressions the tyro in argument supposes the sophist to
72 22|                      them". Also there is the argument that "a man may give what
73 22|                      the man, not against his argument. For if this were a genuine
74 23|                     of the point on which the argument turns: e.g. if the argument
75 23|                   argument turns: e.g. if the argument depends upon combination,
76 23|                     case of amphiboly. If the argument depends on likeness of expression,
77 24|                   nothing to prevent the same argument from having a number of
78 24|                    e.g. in the case of Zeno’s argument to prove that motion is
79 24|                      is no solution of Zeno’s argument: for the solution was all
80 25|                       particular command. The argument is similar, also, as regards
81 25|                      evil". Likewise also the argument of the thief is mistaken.
82 27|                    say that he has brought no argument: for a refutation must be
83 28|                       up in the course of the argument itself. The mode in which
84 28|                    follow is twofold. For the argument either is that as the universal
85 28|                      On this latter claim the argument of Melissus also depends:
86 29|                       but for the sake of the argument, whereas the questioner
87 29|                     it for the purpose of his argument at all.~
88 33|                   former. For we must call an argument the same if it depends upon
89 33|                      same point; but the same argument is apt to be thought by
90 33|                        while others solve the argument of Zeno and Parmenides by
91 33|                     in all cases.~An incisive argument is one which produces the
92 33|            heart-searching. Now a syllogistic argument is most incisive if from
93 33|                      as possible. For the one argument, if the contradictory is
94 33|                   bound to feel perplexed. An argument, then, of this kind is the
95 33|                     depends.~Now sometimes an argument which has not been properly
96 33|                  subject and the nerve of the argument, the reasoning that has
97 33|                     lightly despised, but the argument is quite respectable, though
98 33|                solution sometimes against the argument, at others against the questioner
99 34|                     that in standing up to an argument we shall defend our thesis