Paragraph

 1 1 |             evident. This happens with arguments, as also elsewhere, through
 2 1 |            experts, in the same way in arguments too those who are not well
 3 1 |            bound to study the class of arguments aforesaid: for it is worth
 4 1 |                there exists a class of arguments of this kind, and it is
 5 1 |               there are of sophistical arguments, and how many in number
 6 2 |                                   2~Of arguments in dialogue form there are
 7 2 | Examination-arguments, and Contentious arguments. Didactic arguments are
 8 2 |        Contentious arguments. Didactic arguments are those that reason from
 9 2 |          things on trust): dialectical arguments are those that reason from
10 2 |          another treatise: contentious arguments are those that reason or
11 2 |                 then, of demonstrative arguments has been discussed in the
12 2 |                while that of dialectic arguments and examination-arguments
13 2 |                proceed to speak of the arguments used in competitions and
14 4 |             same names or expressions. Arguments such as the following depend
15 5 |               kind of thing happens in arguments that reason ad impossible:
16 5 |         coming-to-be" as its contrary. Arguments of that kind, then, though
17 5 |              kind.~Such, then, are the arguments that depend upon the consequent
18 6 |                not the case with those arguments which depend upon begging
19 6 |                not the case with those arguments which depend upon begging
20 7 |             comes about in the case of arguments that depend on ambiguity
21 8 |           scientist as well with these arguments.~That we know them by the
22 10|               true distinction between arguments which some people draw when
23 10|                when they say that some arguments are directed against the
24 10|            absurd to suppose that some arguments are directed against the
25 10|            there will be certain other arguments directed neither against
26 10|          expression" describes all the arguments that depend on language:
27 10|             then, any definite kind of arguments that is directed against
28 10|              against the thought. Some arguments are, indeed, directed against
29 11|          sophists both employ the same arguments, but not with the same motives:
30 12|              one is well supplied with arguments: this can be done both properly
31 13|              the object in view in all arguments of the following kind: If
32 13|        pleasant for the pleasant".~All arguments of this kind occur in dealing (
33 14|               and for this reason many arguments seem to lead to solecism
34 14|               the types of contentious arguments, and the subdivisions of
35 15|         conclusion, or whether one has arguments to show both that something
36 16|               of what use is served by arguments of this kind.~The use of
37 16|          anything: for that a party to arguments should find fault with them,
38 16|                clearly see how to meet arguments of this kind, if our previous
39 16|                training, so it is with arguments too, so that supposing we
40 17|                have sometimes to solve arguments rather in the general estimation
41 17|            been confuted, and since in arguments the right to distinguish
42 18|            comes about that one solves arguments that are properly reasoned
43 18|             one solves merely apparent arguments by drawing distinctions.
44 18|    distinctions. Again, inasmuch as of arguments that are properly reasoned
45 20|              solve it properly: for of arguments that depend upon the same
46 21|            gives rise to no fallacious arguments, either as written or as
47 22|           above are also the following arguments. It is asked if a man has
48 22|                Like these are also all arguments of the following kind: "
49 22|                belong to this group of arguments. "If something be in writing
50 23|           general rule in dealing with arguments that depend on language
51 24|                     24~In dealing with arguments that depend on Accident,
52 24|                of attribute meant. All arguments such as the following depend
53 24|            remarked, the correction of arguments that depend upon the same
54 25|                               25~Those arguments which depend upon an expression
55 25|            with its contradictory.~All arguments of the following kind have
56 25|                place and time. For all arguments of the following kind depend
57 26|                case. All the following arguments depend upon a point of that
58 27|               thanks to the badness of arguments of that kind, one should
59 30|                 e.g.) in the following arguments: Supposing to be good and
60 32|             clear in the course of the arguments themselves. Solecism is
61 32|             the result aimed at in all arguments of the following kind: "
62 32|             but "the stone".~Thus that arguments of this kind do not prove
63 33|                observe that of all the arguments aforesaid it is easier with
64 33|                often they are the same arguments as the former. For we must
65 33|               other types, some of the arguments will be easier to see while
66 33|               which occurs in reasoned arguments, respecting which of the
67 33|               the other in contentious arguments, respecting the manner in
68 33|         Therefore it is in syllogistic arguments that the more incisive ones
69 33|              uncertain. Of contentious arguments, on the other hand, the
70 34|              what use is served by all arguments of this kind, and concerning
71 34|                particular how to solve arguments and solecisms-on all these
72 34|               to the same inquiry into arguments. In addition to this we
73 34|              professors of contentious arguments was like the treatment of
74 34|              side supposing that their arguments on either side generally