Paragraph

 1 4 |           making of more than one question into one.~
 2 5 |         true, while the charge in question is untrue. It happens like
 3 5 |        returned as if to a single question. Now, in some cases, it
 4 5 |         and then people treat the question as one, and either confess
 5 5 |          by failing to answer the question, or are exposed to an apparent
 6 6 |       arise because the phrase in question or the term as altered is
 7 6 |         proved; we need a further question to show that "doublet" means
 8 6 |          also be the putting of a question of that kind. Now since
 9 6 |      answer as though to a single question, there will be a refutation;
10 8 |       appropriate to the thing in question. These are those which fail
11 8 |        the nature of the thing in question, which was the function
12 8 |         moment we add the missing question, we also show up its falsity,
13 10|        think it to be used in his question in the same sense in which
14 10|           the questioner puts his question supposing it to be one,
15 10|        meanings of the phrases in question, they clearly cannot describe
16 10|          involves the asking of a question such as bears more than
17 10|          else ought he to put his question except by suggesting a distinction-suppose
18 10|         distinction-suppose one’s question to be speaking of the silent
19 10|          see the ambiguity of his question, and he cannot possibly
20 11|          to conform to the art in question. For false diagrams of geometrical
21 11|           two alternatives in the question: for they will not both
22 12|       questioning and through the question. For to put the question
23 12|          question. For to put the question without framing it with
24 12|        for people rejoin with the question, "What has that to do with
25 12|         never put a controversial question straight away, but say that
26 12|        with you belongs, and then question him as to some point wherein
27 13|       because they do not add the question whether the expression "
28 14|         materials for putting the question be arranged in a certain
29 15|      argument, one should put the question negatively, as though desirous
30 15|        rate as though one put the question without prejudice; for when
31 15|        not put the universal as a question, but take it for granted
32 15|           ought to put it in your question side by side with its contrary.
33 15|      their final proposition as a question, they state it as a conclusion,
34 15|        about it, and to put one’s question on matters of that kind
35 15|        that...?" For then, if the question be taken as one of the premisses
36 17|         evident that to grant the question simply without drawing any
37 17|       made two questions into one question, the fallacy that turns
38 17|           has asked more than one question. If then it be not right
39 17|           answer to any ambiguous question, not even if the predicate
40 17|            that does not make the question one. For it is possible
41 17|          by "begging the original question", and people think that
42 17|           is begging the original question, so whenever any one claims
43 17|         whenever one foresees any question coming, one should put in
44 18|           showing on what kind of question the falsity depends, and
45 19|       amphiboly some contain some question with more than one meaning,
46 19|         making an addition to the question: "Is speaking of the silent
47 22|          of "passivity": for this question is required as well, though
48 22|     whereas there still wants the question whether in using the ambiguous
49 24|      going to be the subject of a question; nor in the case of a man
50 24|        term, or the expression in question, ought to bear a number
51 24|           regard to the phrase in question. It would occur more nearly,
52 25|       appears to be a troublesome question because it is not easy to
53 25|         the same, the decision in question may very well be a just
54 26|          time. If this additional question be put at the start, you
55 26|          accordingly the thing in question will be both greater and
56 27|         suppose the nature of the question to be obvious, one should
57 30|          away at the start. For a question must be single to which
58 30|         despite the fact that the question is not simple, so it is
59 30|          the other, or there is a question of a number of attributes
60 30|         there be not put a single question on a number of points, but
61 32|           be put as an additional question: while if neither is it
62 32|        call him by name". For the question, if put in the latter way,
63 33|       contempt. For whenever some question is left out, of the kind
64 33|        omitted is some extraneous question, then it is by no means
65 34|         brought about, and how to question and what is the way to arrange
66 34|    questions; moreover, as to the question what use is served by all
67 34|           shown, moreover, how to question or arrange the questioning
68 34| rhetorical, others in the form of question and answer, each side supposing