Paragraph

 1 3 |          to use an ungrammatical expression; or, as a last resort, to
 2 4 |        of words, accent, form of expression. Of this we may assure ourselves
 3 4 | amphibolies: (1) When either the expression or the name has strictly
 4 4 |       criticize as unnatural his expression to men ou kataputhetai ombro.
 5 4 |       about owing to the form of expression used, when what is really
 6 4 |         it is possible to use an expression to denote what does not
 7 4 |         which in the form of its expression is like "cutting" or "building":
 8 4 |      Accident:~(2) the use of an expression absolutely or not absolutely
 9 5 |        that depend on whether an expression is used absolutely or in
10 5 |      strictly, occur whenever an expression used in a particular sense
11 5 |          of the closeness of the expression, i.e. because "to be x"
12 5 |        upon the point whether an expression is used in a certain respect
13 7 |      those that depend on the of expression it is because of the likeness
14 7 |       because of the likeness of expression. For it is hard to distinguish
15 7 |       what by different kinds of expression: for a man who can do this
16 10|         are directed against the expression, and others against the
17 10|         are directed against the expression and others against the thought,
18 10|        man does not in using the expression think it to be used in his
19 10|         the argument against the expression. On the other hand, it is
20 10|          whenever a man uses the expression in the same sense which
21 10|  questioned), in dealing with an expression with more than one meaning,
22 10|    directed any more against the expression than against the thought
23 10|         one of them supposes the expression to have many meanings, it
24 10|          be directed against the expression and against the thought,
25 10|      them may be directed to the expression. For "to be directed against
26 10|          be directed against the expression" means in this doctrine "
27 10|          directed against either expression or thought, there will be
28 10|     directed neither against the expression nor against the thought,
29 10|      directed either against the expression or against the thought,
30 10|        those that depend on mere expression are only a branch of those
31 10|   description "dependent on mere expression" describes all the arguments
32 10|         or not?~Moreover, if the expression bears many senses, while
33 10|         those that depend on the expression. There is not, then, any
34 10|     indeed, directed against the expression: but these are not all even
35 13|         again put, then the same expression will be repeated three times, "
36 13|         the question whether the expression "double", just by itself,
37 14|       said to depend on the like expression of unlike things. For, just
38 14|           is both a "matter" for expression and also a "word": and so
39 16|        part they depend upon the expression, they put us in a better
40 17|        is so, is to use the same expression: and this he is both affirming
41 20| combination of words: for if the expression means something different
42 20|   conclusion one should take the expression in the contrary way. All
43 20|          double meaning (for the expression when divided is not the
44 20|        the same.) Accordingly an expression that depends upon division
45 20|  answerer, then, must divide the expression: for "I-saw-a-man-being-beaten
46 20|        present moment." "No; the expression as divided has a different
47 22|         substance because of its expression; e.g. in the following argument: "
48 22|    sensible object" are alike in expression and all denote some form
49 22|          one like one another in expression: but, you see, "to see"
50 22|          things that have a like expression. For the listener adds the
51 22|          to be so because of the expression. The same thing happens
52 22|          the answerer grants the expression without any qualification,
53 23|  argument depends on likeness of expression, the opposite will be the
54 24|       meanings, the term, or the expression in question, ought to bear
55 24|   knowledge "of evils"". But the expression that this is "of so and-so" (="
56 25|   arguments which depend upon an expression that is valid of a particular
57 31|     concave nose". Moreover, the expression must not be granted in the