Paragraph

 1 1 |      while: for a faculty of this kind will make a man seem to
 2 1 |        class of arguments of this kind, and it is at this kind
 3 1 |           kind, and it is at this kind of ability that those aim
 4 4 |      evils, too (for evil of some kind is inevitable), while on
 5 5 |         if it is not a particular kind of being, e.g. if it is
 6 5 |           at the same time". This kind of thing is in some cases
 7 5 |     strictly. A situation of this kind arises, where both the opposite
 8 5 | refutation depended upon it. This kind of thing happens in arguments
 9 5 |       contrary. Arguments of that kind, then, though not inconclusive
10 5 |       much to see a point of that kind.~Such, then, are the arguments
11 6 |     putting of a question of that kind. Now since a proof starts
12 7 |          hard to distinguish what kind of things are signified
13 10|          for a refutation of that kind is a merely apparent proof
14 10|           not, then, any definite kind of arguments that is directed
15 11|           type of fault, and is a kind of foul fighting, so the
16 11|      sophistry is, as we said,’ a kind of art of money-making from
17 11|       concerned with any definite kind of being, nor does it show
18 11|          not contained in any one kind, nor, if they were, could
19 11|        accomplishment of the same kind as geometry, but one which
20 11|         nature, i.e. a particular kind of being, but are like negative
21 11|        principles are not of this kind but are special to particular
22 11|          which is not of the same kind as those which demonstrate.
23 12|       draw the answerer on to the kind of statements against which
24 12|       there is some point of that kind. It is an elementary rule
25 13|        arguments of the following kind: If it is all the same to
26 13|             All arguments of this kind occur in dealing (1) with
27 14|          We have said before what kind of thing "solecism" is.’
28 14|           reason in cases of this kind as well there will be a
29 15|       question on matters of that kind in the form "Do you think
30 15|   generally supposed to bear that kind of character, or who are
31 16|       served by arguments of this kind.~The use of them, then,
32 16|        any term is used, and what kind of resemblances and what
33 16|          of resemblances and what kind of differences occur between
34 16|         to meet arguments of this kind, if our previous account
35 17|          the other tricks of that kind, conceal even a genuine
36 17|          propose questions of the kind, in order that they may
37 18|        reasoning, showing on what kind of question the falsity
38 18|        one-there must be both the kind of solution just described,’
39 20|          not fit all cases of the kind nor yet all ways of putting
40 22|        arguments of the following kind: "Could a man strike a blow
41 22|    quantity, or something of that kind.~
42 24|          adduce an example of the kind of attribute meant. All
43 25|        arguments of the following kind have this feature: "Is it
44 25|        arguments of the following kind depend upon this." Is health,
45 26|       depend upon a point of that kind. "Does a man who knows A
46 27|      badness of arguments of that kind, one should make one’s error
47 32|        arguments of the following kind: "Is a thing truly that
48 32|       Thus that arguments of this kind do not prove solecism but
49 33|           argument, then, of this kind is the most incisive, viz.
50 33|       equal perplexity as to what kind of premiss, of those asked,
51 33|      question is left out, of the kind that concerns both the subject
52 34|          to the number, then, and kind of sources whence fallacies
53 34|          by all arguments of this kind, and concerning the answerer’
54 34|           acquire anything of the kind, but were to present him