Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
concerning 3
concerns 2
conclude 1
conclusion 52
conclusions 4
condition 5
condition-while 1
Frequency    [«  »]
54 these
53 against
53 his
52 conclusion
50 s
49 was
48 been
Aristotle
On Sophistical Refutations

IntraText - Concordances

conclusion

   Paragraph
1 1 | contradictory of the given conclusion. Now some of them do not 2 2 | or appear to reason to a conclusion from premisses that appear 3 4 | upon assuming the original conclusion:~(6) stating as cause what 4 5 | were to suppose at the conclusion of his questions that therefore 5 5 | relation to the proposed conclusion. Also even the questioners 6 6 | are inconclusive: for the conclusion ought to result from the 7 6 | then you should draw the conclusion of a "doublet", not of a " 8 6 | cloak". For the former conclusion also would be true, but 9 6 | definition thereof. For the conclusion ought to come about "because 10 6 | definition thereof. For the conclusion ought to come about "because 11 8 | and this may prove a false conclusion because of the ignorance 12 8 | the questions and that the conclusion was proved, would make the 13 8 | depends on the failure of the conclusion to follow from the argument ( 14 8 | consequent: more over, the conclusion may follow not in fact but 15 11| examination, even though its conclusion be true: for it misleads 16 13| one; but they draw their conclusion straight away. Still it 17 15| argument leading to the same conclusion, or whether one has arguments 18 15| question, they state it as a conclusion, as though they had proved 19 15| One must not ask one’s conclusion in the form of a premiss, 20 17| distinctions is that the conclusion reached looks like a refutation. 21 17| right at the end, when the conclusion is drawn, to say that the 22 17| premisses that lie near the conclusion, and plead in excuse for 23 17| to the argument that the conclusion has not been properly shown, 24 17| the harder it is to draw a conclusion from them. If, again, the 25 18| is used either if a false conclusion has been proved, or if there 26 18| true and others a false conclusion, those that are false in 27 18| false in respect of their conclusion it is possible to solve 28 18| and by showing that the conclusion is not the real state of 29 18| of one of them; for the conclusion is true. So that those who 30 18| unreasoned; and next, whether the conclusion be true or false, in order 31 19| while others contain a conclusion bearing a number of senses: 32 19| silent" is possible, the conclusion has a double meaning, while 33 19| the many senses lie in the conclusion no refutation takes place 34 19| the contradiction of the conclusion he means to prove; e.g. 35 19| even though he draws his conclusion in a quite unambiguous manner, 36 20| one’s opponent draws his conclusion one should take the expression 37 22| what he has, and draws the conclusion as to the whole number that 38 22| qualification, the sophist’s conclusion follows. If, on the other 39 22| on the other hand, the conclusion does not follow, then that 40 24| therefore, as soon as the conclusion has been drawn, say in answer 41 24| man to show that a false conclusion has been proved, but not 42 24| number: for if, when the conclusion is not proved, they pass 43 24| this over and say that a conclusion has been proved and is true, 44 25| solved by considering the conclusion in relation to its contradictory, 45 25| feature one has to find in the conclusion by examining it in comparison 46 26| by comparing together the conclusion with its contradictory, 47 28| that bring one to their conclusion through the consequent you 48 32| is so nor is granted, the conclusion must not be stated: though 49 33| possible it demolishes a conclusion that is accepted as generally 50 33| accepted it will prove a conclusion, negative or positive as 51 33| viz. the one that puts its conclusion on all fours with the propositions 52 33| vague whether it is on the conclusion or on one of the premisses


IntraText® (V89) Copyright 1996-2007 EuloTech SRL