Paragraph

 1 1 |      To reduce it to a single point of contrast it is the business
 2 5 |  argument that turns upon the point whether an expression is
 3 5 |    the reckoning the original point to be proved, in the same
 4 5 |    assumption of the original point to be proved, occur in the
 5 5 |  possible to beg the original point; they appear to refute because
 6 5 |   fail quite as much to see a point of that kind.~Such, then,
 7 6 |      be effected; e.g. if the point concerns a doublet, then
 8 6 |       asks why you think your point proved.~Fallacies that depend
 9 6 |  simplest element or starting point, it is not because it is
10 6 |     is a figure or a starting point or simplest element that
11 6 |      demonstration proves the point about it not qua figure
12 6 |       concerned with the same point. For of "white in a certain
13 6 |    assumption of the original point and upon stating as the
14 6 |     into account the original point, and this is not the case
15 6 |     upon begging the original point.~Those that depend upon
16 6 |    assumption of the original point and upon stating as the
17 6 |     into account the original point, and this is not the case
18 6 |     upon begging the original point.~Those that depend upon
19 7 |     in many cases appearances point to this-and the claim is
20 7 |      that assume the original point, and those of false cause,
21 8 |    assumption of the original point to be proved, in violation
22 8 |     reckoning in the original point". Thus we should have the
23 10|        there are none. But in point of fact those that depend
24 10|  proof.~But, to return to the point whence our argument digressed,
25 12|       question him as to some point wherein their doctrine is
26 12|    every school there is some point of that kind. It is an elementary
27 12|  appropriate here, too, is to point out that the paradox does
28 16|       if he cannot definitely point out their weakness, creates
29 16|    unpractised, even though a point be clear to us, we are often
30 17|     argument to the very same point as oneself, it is not clear
31 17|    supposed that that was the point on which the argument turned,
32 17|      any one claims from us a point such as is bound to follow
33 17|    premiss: for this too is a point upon which a refutation
34 20|     that depend upon the same point the solution is the same,
35 22|    that he has not proved his point: for to "give quickly" is
36 23|   follows the opposite of the point on which the argument turns:
37 24|     that depend upon the same point ought to be the same, whereas
38 24|    one, in a false manner, to point this out is a true solution.
39 26|       arguments depend upon a point of that kind. "Does a man
40 27|     and assuming the original point to be proved, suppose the
41 27| independently of the original point. Secondly, one should say
42 27|       one should say that the point was granted under the impression
43 29|       so, the answerer should point this out, and say that he
44 32|     does not grant this: this point must be put as an additional
45 33|      it depends upon the same point; but the same argument is