Paragraph

 1 5 |       at the conclusion of his questions that therefore he had proved
 2 5 |       be reckoned in among the questions that are necessary to establish
 3 5 |  depend upon the making of two questions into one occur whenever
 4 6 |      either say "Yes" to their questions, or else people suppose
 5 6 |     upon the making of several questions into one consist in our
 6 7 |     all that treat a number of questions as one: for in all of them
 7 8 |        proof were asked in the questions and that the conclusion
 8 8 |      and that which treats two questions as one and so depends upon
 9 10|    didactically should not ask questions but make things clear himself,
10 10|        other should merely ask questions.~
11 11|    anything proceeds by asking questions: for it does not permit
12 11|    have refrained from putting questions, even if not about everything,
13 12|    Also the putting of several questions, even though the position
14 12|        whether to any of these questions he replies "Yes" or replies "
15 12|        to-day do as well.~Some questions are such that in both forms
16 15|        is the putting of one’s questions alternately, whether one
17 15|  induction and assume that the questions could not have been put
18 15|      should not even be put as questions at all; one should take
19 16|      dealt with the sources of questions, and the methods of questioning
20 16|       of dishonesty in putting questions. But it is not the same
21 16|       while being subjected to questions: for what we know, we often
22 17|   asking of amphibolies and of questions that turn upon ambiguity,
23 17|    which questioners put their questions compel the party questioned
24 17|   crowd of persons who propose questions of the kind, in order that
25 17|       If people never made two questions into one question, the fallacy
26 17|   given a single answer to two questions, it is evident that it is
27 17|       even countless different questions when put to one, all together
28 17|    give a single answer to two questions, it is evident that we should
29 17|  statements, e.g. in answer to questions that are not put clearly
30 18|      to show upon which of the questions the appearance depends.
31 18|        when being subjected to questions and when not: for to foresee
32 19|      what he knows" one of the questions contains an amphiboly. Also
33 19|     the many senses lie in the questions, there is no necessity to
34 20|    element of amphiboly in the questions, but it really depends upon
35 20|        all ways of putting the questions: it is valid against the
36 22|      now. So then, he asks the questions as to what he has, and draws
37 30| refutations which make several questions into one, one should draw
38 30|       in these cases of double questions too. Whenever, then, the
39 30|     the man who answers double questions simply can be made to say
40 33|     questioner has not put his questions well.~Just as it is possible
41 33|      possible to marshal one’s questions and reasoning both against
42 34|      is the way to arrange the questions; moreover, as to the question
43 34|       why Socrates used to ask questions and not to answer them;