Paragraph

 1 4 |        induction, and by syllogistic proof based on this-and it may
 2 5 |             occur because the terms "proof" or "refutation" have not
 3 5 |         depends upon it, e.g. in the proof that the "soul" and "life"
 4 6 |             well, if a refutation or proof is to be effected; e.g.
 5 6 |         ignoratio elenchi when once "proof" has been defined. For the
 6 6 |         added: for a refutation is a proof of the contradictory. If,
 7 6 | contradictory. If, then, there is no proof as regards an accident of
 8 6 |            If, then, refutation is a proof, an argument which argued
 9 6 |            of that kind. Now since a proof starts from propositions
10 6 |     propositions and refutation is a proof, refutation, too, will start
11 6 |       conform to the definition of a proof.~
12 7 |      definition of "premiss" and of "proof" is due to the aforesaid
13 8 |              points required for the proof were asked in the questions
14 8 |            so as well, so that false proof will occur through all or
15 8 |             to some one: and so is a proof, in the same way. For unless
16 9 |             every art there is false proof, e.g. according to geometry
17 9 |           there is false geometrical proof, and according to medicine
18 9 |      medicine there is false medical proof. By "according to the art",
19 9 |              For a refutation is the proof of the contradictory of
20 10|             without first discussing Proof: for a refutation is a proof,
21 10|         Proof: for a refutation is a proof, so that one ought to discuss
22 10|            that one ought to discuss proof as well before describing
23 10|            kind is a merely apparent proof of the contradictory of
24 10|        falsity will be either in the proof or in the contradiction (
25 10|            contradiction, not in the proof; in the argument that one
26 10|              it lies in both; in the proof that Homer’s poem is a figure
27 10|         being a cycle it lies in the proof. An argument that does not
28 10|             either respect is a true proof.~But, to return to the point
29 11|       diagram that may be offered in proof of a truth-e.g. Hippocrates’
30 11|             not both of them yield a proof. Dialectic, on the other
31 17|      ambiguity: they do not effect a proof. The only motive for drawing
32 18|            there is only an apparent proof and no real one-there must
33 18|      correction of a merely apparent proof, so as to show upon which
34 19|        number of senses: e.g. in the proof that "speaking of the silent"
35 19|         double meaning, while in the proof that "he who knows does
36 19|          means to prove; e.g. in the proof that "seeing of the blind"
37 22|       premisses be granted, still no proof is effected.~Moreover, the
38 22|    collectively. Again, there is the proof that there is a "third man"
39 24|          that of those who solve the proof that every number is a small
40 24|       aforesaid reasonings, e.g. the proof that "X is your father",
41 24|             that if the appearance a proof depends upon a plurality
42 24|            child".~There is also the proof that "something "of evils"