Paragraph

 1 4 |       needs to be" has a double meaning: it means what is inevitable,
 2 4 |        to him" is not single in meaning: sometimes it means "the
 3 4 |       silent" also has a double meaning: it may mean that the speaker
 4 4 |      has strictly more than one meaning, e.g. aetos and the "dog"; (
 5 4 |        alone have more than one meaning in combination; e.g. "knowing
 6 4 |           possibly has a single meaning: but both together have
 7 4 |     while not writing". For the meaning is not the same if one divides
 8 4 |         always to have the same meaning when divided and when combined,
 9 6 |       some depend upon a double meaning, e.g. ambiguity of words
10 7 |        as adding nothing to the meaning, and so grant the statement
11 8 |     ambiguous term has a single meaning, and that which depends
12 8 |         that does have a single meaning, but only one that appears
13 10|   expression with more than one meaning, were to suppose it to have
14 10| argument as bears more than one meaning to be directed against the
15 10|     such as bears more than one meaning.~It is, too, altogether
16 10|         that there is any other meaning but one. For what is there
17 10|        where there is no double meaning? "Are the units in four
18 13|         just by itself, has any meaning or no, and if so, whether
19 13|         whether it has the same meaning, or a different one; but
20 13|      the same, to have the same meaning as well.~
21 17|    questioner distinguishes his meaning adequately, the answerer
22 19|     question with more than one meaning, while others contain a
23 19|         conclusion has a double meaning, while in the proof that "
24 20|       upon combination. For the meaning that depends upon the division
25 20|    words is not really a double meaning (for the expression when
26 20|        eros is a case of double meaning. (In writing, indeed, a
27 20|         divided has a different meaning: for it is true to say-in-the-present-moment
28 22|        by himself, thinking the meaning to be alike: whereas really
29 22|       alike: whereas really the meaning is not alike, though it
30 22|  ambiguous term he had a single meaning in view: for if he grants
31 30|         all" have more than one meaning, so that the resulting affirmation
32 31|         relative terms have any meaning in abstraction by themselves,
33 31|   perhaps say, has not even any meaning at all, any more than has "
34 31|     half": and even if it has a meaning, yet it has not the same
35 31|         yet it has not the same meaning as in the combination. Nor
36 31|          concave" has a general meaning which is the same in the
37 31|        from differentiating its meaning; in fact it bears one sense
38 32|        necessarily, because the meaning of "this object" is not "
39 32|       of a shield" would be the meaning of "this object's". Nor
40 32|          this" has not the same meaning in "Do you know this?" as
41 33|         terms, e.g. whether the meaning of "Being" and "One" is