Paragraph

 1 4 |         what needs to be" has a double meaning: it means what is
 2 4 |       of the silent" also has a double meaning: it may mean that
 3 5 |     that the same thing is both double and not double: for two
 4 5 |    thing is both double and not double: for two is double of one,
 5 5 |      and not double: for two is double of one, but not double of
 6 5 |       is double of one, but not double of three. Or, it may be,
 7 5 |       they show that it is both double and not double of the same
 8 5 |       it is both double and not double of the same thing, but not
 9 5 |         same respect: for it is double in length but not double
10 5 |        double in length but not double in breadth. Or, it may be,
11 5 |         they show it to be both double and not double of the same
12 5 |       to be both double and not double of the same thing and in
13 6 |    language, some depend upon a double meaning, e.g. ambiguity
14 10|         cases where there is no double meaning? "Are the units
15 13|      state its definition, the "double" and "double of half" are
16 13|   definition, the "double" and "double of half" are the same: if
17 13|          are the same: if then "double" be the "double of half",
18 13|        if then "double" be the "double of half", it will be the "
19 13|       of half", it will be the "double of half of half". And if,
20 13|      half". And if, instead of "double", "double of half" be again
21 13|       if, instead of "double", "double of half" be again put, then
22 13|       be repeated three times, "double of half of half of half".
23 13|        desire of something, and double is double of something,
24 13|        something, and double is double of something, i.e. double
25 13|       double of something, i.e. double of half: also in dealing (
26 13|         whether the expression "double", just by itself, has any
27 18|          false reasoning" has a double meaning-for it is used either
28 19|  possible, the conclusion has a double meaning, while in the proof
29 20|       the words is not really a double meaning (for the expression
30 20|      eros and eros is a case of double meaning. (In writing, indeed,
31 26|       the same thing to be both double and not double, but grant
32 26|       to be both double and not double, but grant that it is possible,
33 30|         it is in these cases of double questions too. Whenever,
34 30| inasmuch as the man who answers double questions simply can be
35 31|       by themselves, e.g. that "double" is a significant term apart
36 31|    apart from the whole phrase "double of half" merely on the ground
37 31|        is white. The bare word "double", one may perhaps say, has