Paragraph

 1 1 |  reasoning and refutation that is apparent but not real. Now for some
 2 1 |           who makes money from an apparent but unreal wisdom); for
 3 5 |      conditions and give a merely apparent refutation, showing (e.g.)
 4 5 |        their refutation is merely apparent. One might, with some violence,
 5 5 |    question, or are exposed to an apparent refutation. Thus "Is A and
 6 5 |           to expose himself to an apparent refutation or to make an
 7 6 |         then, is either to divide apparent proofs and refutations as
 8 6 |      apparently, there will be an apparent refutation of his thesis.
 9 6 |           a refutation, is merely apparent, and the rest failing to
10 8 |           know on how many points apparent syllogisms depend, we know
11 8 |          false conclusions and an apparent refutation depend must be
12 8 |        the same in number. Now an apparent refutation depends upon
13 8 |        make the refutation merely apparent, e.g. that which depends
14 9 |      examine whether it is merely apparent without being real, and,
15 9 |     considerations that make them apparent to the man in the street.
16 9 | refutation that is either real or apparent, i.e. either dialectical
17 10|          of that kind is a merely apparent proof of the contradictory
18 10|          the refutation be merely apparent. In the argument that speaking
19 10|        but these are not all even apparent refutations, let alone all
20 10|   refutations. For there are also apparent refutations which do not
21 11|           1) one such is a merely apparent reasoning, on subjects on
22 11|        hand. So, then, any merely apparent reasoning about these things
23 11|        argument: for it is merely apparent in its conformity to the
24 11|        money-making from a merely apparent wisdom, and this is why
25 11|          why they aim at a merely apparent demonstration: and quarrelsome
26 11|           so far as its aim is an apparent victory, while in so far
27 11|           so far as its aim is an apparent wisdom, it will be sophistical:
28 12|             12~So much, then, for apparent refutations. As for showing
29 14|           refutations.~Almost all apparent solecisms depend upon the
30 18|            or if there is only an apparent proof and no real one-there
31 18|        the correction of a merely apparent proof, so as to show upon
32 18|         whereas one solves merely apparent arguments by drawing distinctions.