Paragraph

 1 2 |        Examination-arguments, and Contentious arguments. Didactic arguments
 2 2 |      defined in another treatise: contentious arguments are those that
 3 11|        this is a sophist. Now for contentious and sophistical reasoning: (
 4 11|       geometrical figures are not contentious (for the resulting fallacies
 5 11|           about these things is a contentious argument, and any reasoning
 6 11|           genuine reasoning, is a contentious argument: for it is merely
 7 11|           fighting, so the art of contentious reasoning is foul fighting
 8 11|          so in the latter case do contentious reasoners. Those, then,
 9 11|        generally considered to be contentious and quarrelsome persons,
10 11|           will be sophistical and contentious, but not in the same respect;
11 11|       respect; rather, it will be contentious in so far as its aim is
12 11|          without the reality. The contentious argument stands in somewhat
13 11|       whereas the latter is not a contentious reasoner, because he bases
14 11|     dialectic will yet clearly be contentious as regards other subjects.
15 11|       means of the lunules is not contentious, Bryson’s solution is contentious:
16 11| contentious, Bryson’s solution is contentious: and the former argument
17 11|         then, the relation of the contentious argument to the dialectical
18 11|   diagrams to the geometrician, a contentious argument upon the aforesaid
19 11|      demonstrate. This is why the contentious reasoner does not stand
20 11|          a false diagram: for the contentious reasoner will not be given
21 14|            then, are the types of contentious arguments, and the subdivisions
22 15|       useful also for purposes of contentious argument: for the object
23 16|         methods of questioning in contentious disputations: next we have
24 17|          general rule in fighting contentious persons, to treat them not
25 17|        incidentally the object of contentious arguers, though less so
26 17|        than the true solutions in contentious reasonings and in the encounter
27 33|        demolish, and the other in contentious arguments, respecting the
28 33|         demolish is uncertain. Of contentious arguments, on the other
29 34|         by the paid professors of contentious arguments was like the treatment