Paragraph

 1 2 | principles appropriate to each subject and not from the opinions
 2 2 |       possess knowledge of the subject is bound to know-in what
 3 2 |   accepted but are not so. The subject, then, of demonstrative
 4 5 |        predicates and to their subject as well. Thus (e.g.), "If
 5 7 |        same accidents as their subject. Likewise also with those
 6 9 |     the accepted proofs on any subject whatever we grasp those
 7 9 |    refutations current on that subject. For a refutation is the
 8 11|       proper to the particular subject, but are generally thought
 9 11|       fallacies conform to the subject of the art)-any more than
10 11|        does not conform to the subject in hand. So, then, any merely
11 11|      appears to conform to the subject in hand, even though it
12 11|       cannot be adapted to any subject except geometry, because
13 11|        apply to the particular subject in hand. For suppose the
14 11|      special principles of the subject under discussion but from
15 11|  consequences attaching to the subject which a man may indeed know
16 11|      knowing the theory of the subject, but which if he do not
17 11|      knowledge of any definite subject. For this reason, too, it
18 12|      reference to any definite subject is a good bait for these
19 12|     when they have no definite subject before them. Also the putting
20 12|        to do with the original subject?" It is, too, an elementary
21 24|       as to be going to be the subject of a question; nor in the
22 30|   attributes belong to the one subject, or the one to the many,
23 30|       attribute belongs to one subject but not to the other, or
24 30|      one attribute only of one subject only, the absurdity will
25 33|    kind that concerns both the subject and the nerve of the argument,
26 34|       we have been through the subject of Fallacies, as we have
27 34|       to him. Moreover, on the subject of Rhetoric there exists
28 34|       long ago, whereas on the subject of reasoning we had nothing