Paragraph

 1 6 | that depend on Accident are clear cases of ignoratio elenchi
 2 6 |     or said absolutely, are clear cases of ignoratio elenchi
 3 8 |     his thesis, do not make clear whether he is ignorant:
 4 8 |     same line of inquiry is clear: for the same considerations
 5 8 |  appearing to refute, it is clear that the considerations
 6 9 |   street. Accordingly it is clear that the dialectician’s
 7 10|   have many meanings, it is clear that such a discussion will
 8 10|   questions but make things clear himself, the other should
 9 12|     majority. So that it is clear that they, too, used to
10 14|    he seems to do so. It is clear, then, that any one could
11 14|     and so is white".~It is clear, then, that for solecisms
12 16|      even though a point be clear to us, we are often too
13 17| point as oneself, it is not clear whether one has been refuted:
14 17| been refuted: for it is not clear whether at the moment one
15 17|     an amphiboly, it is not clear whether he has been confuted
16 17|    paradoxical. Since it is clear what is meant by "begging
17 17|  premiss put forward is not clear, one must not grant it simply.~
18 21|   one should solve this, is clear: for the word does not mean
19 22|                    22~It is clear also how one must meet those
20 30|     a refutation. But it is clear that if there be not put
21 31|    a number of times, it is clear that one must not grant
22 32|   of their solution will be clear in the course of the arguments
23 32|    you should meet them, is clear from what has been said.~
24 33|  different terms, is not so clear as it was. Accordingly,
25 33|   form of fallacy, some are clear even to the man in the street (
26 33|      and "Is the North wind clear?" "No, indeed; for it has
27 34|  did not know. We have made clear, in the course of what precedes,
28 34|     adequately completed is clear. But we must not omit to