Paragraph

 1 4 |     used, when what is really different is expressed in the same
 2 5 |        e.g.), "If Coriscus be different from "man", he is different
 3 5 |   different from "man", he is different from himself: for he is
 4 5 |       is a man": or "If he be different from Socrates, and Socrates
 5 5 |     admitted that Coriscus is different from a man, because it so
 6 5 |    said that he (Coriscus) is different is a man".~Those that depend
 7 5 |        to be x" is but little different from "to be", and "not to
 8 5 |       is the same and what is different.~The refutation which depends
 9 7 |       by the same and what by different kinds of expression: for
10 7 |       of the likeness (of two different things), and the likeness
11 10|        and granted it in some different sense from the figure which
12 13|    has the same meaning, or a different one; but they draw their
13 14|       the inflections are all different, whereas in the neuter some
14 16|     we often do not know in a different context. Moreover, just
15 17|     have asked if they, being different, had had one name? For if
16 17|      to answer even countless different questions when put to one,
17 17|    the case is like as though different things has actually had
18 17|       distinction between the different kinds of fallacy.~In the
19 20|    expression means something different when divided and when combined,
20 20|   expression as divided has a different meaning: for it is true
21 22| problem, Are they the same or different?" For the one denotes an
22 24|      that case the apparently different meanings seem to depend
23 30|     is the same as itself and different from anything else, inasmuch
24 30|        and also that they are different from themselves, it follows
25 30|       be both the same as and different from themselves. Moreover,
26 33|     of them, when worked with different terms, is not so clear as
27 33|     all their applications or different; for some think that "Being"