Paragraph

 1 3 |      five in number, refutation, fallacy, paradox, solecism, and
 2 3 |       that he is committing some fallacy, or as a third best to lead
 3 5 |        some violence, bring this fallacy into the group of fallacies
 4 6 |       all the aforesaid modes of fallacy into breaches of the definition
 5 6 |          bit by bit, and try the fallacy thereby. For of the fallacies
 6 6 |          and of phrases, and the fallacy of like verbal forms (for
 7 6 |          it is obvious that this fallacy too consists in ignorance
 8 6 |         thesis. All the types of fallacy, then, fall under ignorance
 9 7 |       hurried into assent to the fallacy is that we suppose every
10 7 |        reason, too, this type of fallacy is to be ranked among those
11 8 |         relation and manner, the fallacy may be dependent on some
12 12|      answerer is committing some fallacy, and drawing his argument
13 12|      drawing him into paradox or fallacy, and also, whether to any
14 12|          rule for eliciting some fallacy or paradox that one should
15 12|     appropriate for showing up a fallacy is the sophistic rule, that
16 14|      inflection for another. The fallacy comes about because "this" (
17 16|         is easily committed to a fallacy by some one else, and does
18 17| questions into one question, the fallacy that turns upon ambiguity
19 17|   between the different kinds of fallacy.~In the case, then, of names
20 17|          kingdom." But this is a fallacy: for we say that man "belongs
21 20|          was being beaten?" This fallacy has also in it an element
22 22|    individual men. But that is a fallacy, for "Man", and indeed every
23 33|          be the silliest form of fallacy, some are clear even to
24 33|        to grasp to which class a fallacy belongs, and whether it
25 34|         opponent is committing a fallacy and make him utter paradoxes;