Paragraph

 1 2 |           who pretends to possess knowledge of the subject is bound
 2 4 |         understand" by the use of knowledge, and also "to acquire knowledge".
 3 4 |   knowledge, and also "to acquire knowledge". Again, "Evils are good:
 4 4 |        the thesis, "There must be knowledge of what one knows": for
 5 4 |          this phrase to mean that knowledge belongs to both the knower
 6 4 |           letters themselves have knowledge or that someone else has
 7 9 |         to try to grasp without a knowledge of everything that is. This,
 8 9 |           have to have scientific knowledge of everything: for some
 9 10|           in that". Also, "Is the knowledge of contraries one or not?
10 11|          view not the man who has knowledge, but the ignorant pretender.
11 11|            even though he has not knowledge. For it is possible even
12 11|     possible even for one without knowledge to hold an examination of
13 11| examination of one who is without knowledge, if also the latter grants
14 11|     examining does not consist in knowledge of any definite subject.
15 15|           trying to show that the knowledge of contraries is, or is
16 20|          bad." Again, "Things the knowledge of which is good, are good
17 20|         aren't they?" "Yes." "The knowledge, however, of evil is good:
18 20| evil-thing-to-learn, although the knowledge of evils is good." Again, "
19 24|           good"; for wisdom is a "knowledge "of evils"". But the expression
20 31|          the combination. Nor is "knowledge" the same thing in a specific
21 31|           it, e.g. to be "medical knowledge") as it is in general: for
22 31|        for in general it was the "knowledge of the knowable". In the
23 34|           but also with a show of knowledge, we therefore proposed for
24 34|         he would impart a form of knowledge to obviate any pain in the