Paragraph

 1 2 |          Of arguments in dialogue form there are four classes:~
 2 4 |        division of words, accent, form of expression. Of this we
 3 4 |           come about owing to the form of expression used, when
 4 4 |          is expressed in the same form, e.g. a masculine thing
 5 4 |            is a word which in the form of its expression is like "
 6 5 |      perishing, then a particular form of perishing will have a
 7 5 |  perishing will have a particular form of coming-to-be as its contrary:
 8 5 |         now death is a particular form of perishing and is contrary
 9 5 |     contrary to death, which is a form of perishing, and that perishing
10 14|         this" (touto) is a common form of several inflections:
11 15|       matters of that kind in the form "Do you think that...?"
12 15|           one’s conclusion in the form of a premiss, while some
13 22|    expression and all denote some form of passivity, while again "
14 22|         see, "to see" is surely a form of being struck by a sensible
15 22|          it is at the same time a form of passivity and of activity."
16 22|        say that "to see" is not a form of "doing" (activity) but
17 22|        granted that "to cut" is a form of present, and "to have
18 22|      present, and "to have cut" a form of past, activity, and so
19 25|       will not he some particular form of being. Is it possible
20 33|        thought to be the silliest form of fallacy, some are clear
21 34|   developed them to their present form, Tisias coming next after
22 34|         rhetorical, others in the form of question and answer,
23 34| professing that he would impart a form of knowledge to obviate