Paragraph

 1 5 | questions that therefore he had proved dialectically that he was
 2 5 |        the original point to be proved, in the same respect and
 3 5 |        the original point to be proved, occur in the same way,
 4 5 |       the same. Now this is not proved: for the impossibility results
 5 6 |       true, but it has not been proved; we need a further question
 6 6 |        why you think your point proved.~Fallacies that depend on
 7 8 |         that the conclusion was proved, would make the answerer
 8 8 |        the original point to be proved, in violation of the clause "
 9 10|       from the figure which was proved to contain two right angles,
10 15|  conclusion, as though they had proved that "Therefore so-and-so
11 18|       false conclusion has been proved, or if there is only an
12 22|         evident that he has not proved his point: for to "give
13 23|   inanimate and the sophist has proved it to be animate, say how
14 24|       false conclusion has been proved, but not to show on what
15 24|        mistaken, and even if he proved his case ten thousand times
16 24|     depends. If then he has not proved his case, or is trying to
17 24|      when the conclusion is not proved, they pass this over and
18 24|      that a conclusion has been proved and is true, on the ground
19 27|        the original point to be proved, suppose the nature of the
20 27|        for a refutation must be proved independently of the original
21 32|         is a "she"," he has not proved the solecism, even if the
22 32|        then the sophist has not proved his case either in fact