Paragraph

 1 1 |           their counters. But the two cases (names and things)
 2 4 |                       4~There are two styles of refutation: for
 3 5 |        double and not double: for two is double of one, but not
 4 5 |         depend upon the making of two questions into one occur
 5 6 |           has its angles equal to two right-angles, and it happens
 6 7 |           out of the likeness (of two different things), and the
 7 8 | impossible) and that which treats two questions as one and so
 8 9 |     thesis, so that either one or two proofs of the contradictory
 9 10|           clearly cannot describe two separate classes of argument.
10 10|       which was proved to contain two right angles, has the questioner
11 11|         whichever he likes of the two alternatives in the question:
12 17|      before.~If people never made two questions into one question,
13 17|          given a single answer to two questions, it is evident
14 17|           give a single answer to two questions, it is evident
15 17|      grant it simply.~Whenever of two things it is generally thought
16 17|          is uncertain in which of two senses the premiss proposed
17 17|       uncertainty in which of the two senses the premiss contains
18 18|           is possible to solve in two ways; for it is possible
19 25|       easy to see in which of the two connexions the word "absolutely"
20 30|        then they must both become two. So of two unequal things
21 30|       must both become two. So of two unequal things each being