Paragraph

 1 4 |      depends upon assuming the original conclusion:~(6) stating
 2 5 | including in the reckoning the original point to be proved, in the
 3 5 |       on the assumption of the original point to be proved, occur
 4 5 |      it is possible to beg the original point; they appear to refute
 5 6 |     upon the assumption of the original point and upon stating as
 6 6 |        taking into account the original point, and this is not the
 7 6 |        depend upon begging the original point.~Those that depend
 8 6 |     upon the assumption of the original point and upon stating as
 9 6 |        taking into account the original point, and this is not the
10 6 |        depend upon begging the original point.~Those that depend
11 7 |       of those that assume the original point, and those of false
12 8 |       is the assumption of the original point to be proved, in violation
13 8 |       without reckoning in the original point". Thus we should have
14 12|        has that to do with the original subject?" It is, too, an
15 17|       is meant by "begging the original question", and people think
16 17|    them that he is begging the original question, so whenever any
17 24| refutations by demolishing the original proposition asked: for they
18 27|       begging and assuming the original point to be proved, suppose
19 27|    proved independently of the original point. Secondly, one should
20 34|       It remains to recall our original proposal and to bring our
21 34|     taken them on, whereas the original discoveries generally make