Paragraph

 1 1 |         knows and to be able to show up the man who makes them;
 2 3 |        or as the second best to show that he is committing some
 3 5 |      three. Or, it may be, they show that it is both double and
 4 5 |    breadth. Or, it may be, they show it to be both double and
 5 5 |       when rhetoricians wish to show that a man is an adulterer,
 6 6 |      need a further question to show that "doublet" means the
 7 8 |       missing question, we also show up its falsity, e.g. in
 8 11|      kind of being, nor does it show anything, nor is it even
 9 11|         if it were concerned to show things, it would have refrained
10 15|   producing anger are to make a show of the wish to play foul,
11 15|    whether one has arguments to show both that something is so,
12 15|      say that you are trying to show that the knowledge of contraries
13 18|        apparent proof, so as to show upon which of the questions
14 20|        put marks at the side to show the pronunciation—but the
15 23| previous denial that it was so, show in what sense it is alive:
16 24|        is possible for a man to show that a false conclusion
17 24|         been proved, but not to show on what it depends, e.g.
18 28|       the consequent you should show up in the course of the
19 34|   discussion, and how we are to show that our opponent is committing
20 34|   dialectically but also with a show of knowledge, we therefore