Paragraph

 1 1 |   same formulae, and a single name, have a number of meanings.
 2 4 |  either the expression or the name has strictly more than one
 3 5 |      attribute-not merely the name, but the reality-and a name
 4 5 |   name, but the reality-and a name that is not merely synonymous
 5 6 |      they were called by that name. For the appearance of a
 6 17|      Well, nor did the simple name in the former case: so where
 7 17|  being different, had had one name? For if the term applied
 8 17|     has actually had the same name applied to them. If then,
 9 17|  secured not under a definite name, but by a comparison of
10 17|       there is no established name.~Since, again, in regard
11 17|        for people call by the name of "maxims" both true opinions
12 19|     has asserted but only its name; and that therefore there
13 22|  affirmed, and not merely the name: whereas there still wants
14 32|     the solecism, even if the name "Coriscus" does signify
15 32| object is what you call it by name?" "Yes". "But you call it
16 32|        But you call it by the name of a shield: this object
17 32|       is what you call him by name", while "the name you call
18 32|      him by name", while "the name you call him by is Cleon'
19 32|    his, is what I call him by name". For the question, if put