Paragraph

 1 1 |            the business of one who knows a thing, himself to avoid
 2 1 |           in the subjects which he knows and to be able to show up
 3 4 |           be knowledge of what one knows": for it is possible by
 4 11|       taken not from thing that he knows or from the special principles
 5 19|          in the proof that "he who knows does not understand what
 6 19|        does not understand what he knows" one of the questions contains
 7 22|            by discovery that a man knows what he knows?" "Yes." "
 8 22|           that a man knows what he knows?" "Yes." "But suppose that
 9 22|      either method." No: "what" he knows, means" every single thing"
10 22|             every single thing" he knows, individually; but this
11 22|           mean "all the things" he knows, collectively. Again, there
12 23|       discovery each thing that he knows, singly? but not the things
13 23|         but not the things that he knows, collectively." Also a man
14 24|           generally agreed: for he knows both that Coriscus is Coriscus
15 24|            possible, when e.g. one knows that X is white, but does
16 24| approaching figure and Coriscus he knows both that it is approaching
17 26|         that kind. "Does a man who knows A to be A, know the thing
18 26|            A?" "Yes." "But one who knows that Coriscus is Coriscus
19 26|           musical, so that he both knows and is ignorant of the same