Paragraph

 1 1 | ability that those aim whom we call sophists. Let us now go
 2 17|      as maxims are (for people call by the name of "maxims"
 3 22|       whit even if one were to call the clement he has isolated
 4 30|      to say that it is true to call these good, and that it
 5 30|         and that it is true to call them evil and likewise to
 6 30|      them evil and likewise to call them neither good nor evil (
 7 32|     truly that which you truly call it?" "Yes". "But, speaking
 8 32|       speaking of a stone, you call him real: therefore of a
 9 32|       stone him whom you truly call him?" he would be generally
10 32|        to ask, "Is he what you call her?" Speak in this way
11 32|       speaking of a stick, you call it real: therefore, of a
12 32|        this object is what you call it by name?" "Yes". "But
13 32|      by name?" "Yes". "But you call it by the name of a shield:
14 32|       again if "He is what you call him by name", while "the
15 32|     name", while "the name you call him by is Cleon's", is he
16 32|         He, not his, is what I call him by name". For the question,
17 33|        the former. For we must call an argument the same if