Paragraph

 1 5 |   fallacies occur because the terms "proof" or "refutation"
 2 7 |      ambiguous term (for some terms it is not easy to divide,
 3 7 |     sameness and otherness of terms, i.e. their unity and multiplicity,
 4 11|  being, but are like negative terms, while other principles
 5 13| dealing (1) with any relative terms which not only have relative
 6 13|       in dealing (2) with any terms which, though they be not
 7 13|   though they be not relative terms at all, yet have their substance,
 8 17|      in the case of ambiguous terms either: for the remark is
 9 28|       of the opposites of the terms involved: for if A follows
10 30|      in the case of ambiguous terms, an attribute belongs to
11 31|      predications of relative terms have any meaning in abstraction
12 31|     knowable". In the case of terms that are predicated of the
13 31|    that are predicated of the terms through which they are defined,
14 33|    when worked with different terms, is not so clear as it was.
15 33|       often fight about their terms, e.g. whether the meaning