Paragraph

 1 4 |  profess to-be: you profess a stone to-be: ergo you profess-to-be
 2 4 |      ergo you profess-to-be a stone". Also, "Speaking of the
 3 32|     Yes". "But, speaking of a stone, you call him real: therefore
 4 32|      him real: therefore of a stone it follows that "him is
 5 32|      No: rather, talking of a stone means not saying which’
 6 32|    any one were to ask, "Is a stone him whom you truly call
 7 32|    follows that it is real." "Stone", however, and "he" have
 8 32|       put that "he" means the stone. If, however, this neither
 9 32|       this?" as in "This is a stone"; in the first it stands
10 32|       have understanding of a stone: therefore you understand
11 32| therefore you understand of a stone." No: the one phrase is
12 32|     is in the genitive, "of a stone", while the other is in
13 32|      is in the accusative, "a stone": and what was granted was
14 32|      you understand not "of a stone", but "the stone".~Thus
15 32|    not "of a stone", but "the stone".~Thus that arguments of