Paragraph

 1 1 | therefore we suppose that what follows in the names, follows in
 2 1 |     what follows in the names, follows in the things as well, just
 3 5 |    that the absolute statement follows as well; and also in all
 4 5 |        to be; any more than it follows that if a man in a fever
 5 10|    silent possible or not?’-as follows, "Is the answer "No" in
 6 22|       the sophist’s conclusion follows. If, on the other hand,
 7 23|       that the solution always follows the opposite of the point
 8 28|       is that as the universal follows on its particular-as (e.g.) "
 9 28|  particular-as (e.g.) "animal" follows from "man"-so does the particular
10 28|       terms involved: for if A follows B, it is claimed that A’
11 29|      subtraction the absurdity follows none the less: and then
12 30|  different from themselves, it follows that the same things must
13 32|        therefore of a stone it follows that "him is real"." No:
14 32|       therefore, of a stick it follows that it is real." "Stone",
15 32|       not be stated: though it follows apparently, because the