Paragraph

 1 3 |       refutation, fallacy, paradox, solecism, and fifthly to reduce the
 2 3 |           fourthly to reduce him to solecism, i.e. to make the answerer,
 3 8 |           depend on language and on solecism. If then, fallacious proofs
 4 14|          before what kind of thing "solecism" is.’ It is possible both
 5 14| destructress" (oulomenen) commits a solecism, though he does not seem
 6 14|               oulomenon) commits no solecism though he seems to do so.
 7 14|           arguments seem to lead to solecism which do not really do so,
 8 14|            being" (to einai). Also, Solecism resembles in a certain way
 9 14|             we come upon a material solecism, so here we come upon a
10 32|           the arguments themselves. Solecism is the result aimed at in
11 32|           For this reason, also, no solecism is incurred, suppose any
12 32|               he has not proved the solecism, even if the name "Coriscus"
13 32|           of this kind do not prove solecism but merely appear to do