Paragraph

 1 1 |  discuss sophistic refutations, i.e. what appear to be refutations
 2 3 |         reduce him to solecism, i.e. to make the answerer, in
 3 5 |    closeness of the expression, i.e. because "to be x" is but
 4 6 |     equal assume one magnitude: i.e. he assumes the consequent.
 5 7 |         and otherness of terms, i.e. their unity and multiplicity,
 6 9 |        either real or apparent, i.e. either dialectical or apparently
 7 10|         granted it. If now any (i.e. both the questioner and
 8 11| constitute a particular nature, i.e. a particular kind of being,
 9 13|         is double of something, i.e. double of half: also in
10 25| particular respect or relation, i.e. being true in some things,
11 25|    speak of, though absolutely, i.e. to suffer, they are unjust.~
12 31|       the latter "bandyshaped"; i.e. it makes no difference whether