Paragraph

 1 8 |     conclusion may follow not in fact but only verbally: then,
 2 10|     argument whatsoever; for the fact of being directed against
 3 10|        are none. But in point of fact those that depend on mere
 4 10| dialectical argument, and of the fact that while he who argues
 5 19|        he has negated is not the fact which one has asserted but
 6 22|      sophist to have negated the fact which he (the tyro) affirmed,
 7 26|         might be ignorant of the fact that he is musical, so that
 8 30|     happens, no harm despite the fact that the question is not
 9 31|  differentiating its meaning; in fact it bears one sense as applied
10 32|       while if neither is it the fact nor does he grant it, then
11 32|        proved his case either in fact or as against the person
12 34|    connexion with it. This is in fact what has happened in regard