Paragraph

 1 4 |  ambiguous; it signifies both "to understand" by the use of knowledge,
 2 7 |          individual thing, and we understand it as being one with the
 3 10|       while the answerer does not understand or suppose it to have them,
 4 19|       that "he who knows does not understand what he knows" one of the
 5 19|       manner: "Do people-then not understand what they know? "Yes, but
 6 19|       that "those who know cannot understand what they know", and to
 7 32| understanding of anything, do you understand it?" "Yes." "But you have
 8 32|         of a stone: therefore you understand of a stone." No: the one
 9 32|         was granted was that "you understand that, not of that, of which
10 32|       understanding", so that you understand not "of a stone", but "the