Paragraph

 1 1 |       argument that turns upon names only. It is impossible in
 2 1 |        discussed: we use their names as symbols instead of them;
 3 1 |       that what follows in the names, follows in the things as
 4 1 |   counters. But the two cases (names and things) are not alike.
 5 1 |     things) are not alike. For names are finite and so is the
 6 1 |   acquainted with the force of names misreason both in their
 7 4 |     the same thing by the same names or expressions. Arguments
 8 14|   designations. For only those names which end in o and n, have
 9 16|       things and between their names. In the second place they
10 17| fallacy.~In the case, then, of names that are used literally