Paragraph

1 8 | refute and prove people to be ignorant according to the nature
2 8 |      make clear whether he is ignorant: for sophists entangle the
3 11|    who has knowledge, but the ignorant pretender. He, then, is
4 11|       know, he is bound to be ignorant of the theory. So then clearly
5 26|      same way, "is one who is ignorant that A is A ignorant of
6 26|       is ignorant that A is A ignorant of the thing called A?" "
7 26| Coriscus is Coriscus might be ignorant of the fact that he is musical,
8 26|     that he both knows and is ignorant of the same thing." Is a