Paragraph

  1 1 |        business of one who knows a thing, himself to avoid fallacies
  2 4 |        might fall to mean the same thing by the same names or expressions.
  3 4 |            saying that "One single thing if you can carry a crowd
  4 4 |        same form, e.g. a masculine thing by a feminine termination,
  5 4 |         termination, or a feminine thing by a masculine, or a neuter
  6 5 |         belong in like manner to a thing and to its accident. For
  7 5 |       accident. For since the same thing has many accidents there
  8 5 |          should belong to all of a thing’s predicates and to their
  9 5 |             for it is not the same thing "to be x" and "to be" absolutely.
 10 5 |             For it is not the same thing "not to be x" and "not to
 11 5 |           same time". This kind of thing is in some cases easily
 12 5 |           or of neither: e.g. if a thing is half white and half black,
 13 5 |       showing (e.g.) that the same thing is both double and not double:
 14 5 |         and not double of the same thing, but not that it is so in
 15 5 |         and not double of the same thing and in the same respect
 16 5 |     depended upon it. This kind of thing happens in arguments that
 17 5 |           and "blind" apply to one thing and to a number of things
 18 5 |         For if "blind" describes a thing that cannot see though nature
 19 5 |            so. Whenever, then, one thing can see while another cannot,
 20 6 |           be the same, just as the thing signified should be as well,
 21 6 |            doublet" means the same thing, in order to satisfy any
 22 6 |        treats the admission that a thing is "white in a certain respect"
 23 6 |        accident in the case of one thing only (e.g. the identity
 24 6 |           the identity of a yellow thing and honey and of a white
 25 6 |           and honey and of a white thing and swan), whereas the consequent
 26 6 |      always involves more than one thing: for we claim that things
 27 6 |           same as one and the same thing are also the same as one
 28 6 |            beginning" are the same thing, or to "become equal" and
 29 6 |           statement about a single thing. For the same definition
 30 6 |  definition applies to "one single thing only" and to the "thing",
 31 6 |            thing only" and to the "thing", simply, e.g. to "man"
 32 6 |          one which claims a single thing of a single thing, a "proposition",
 33 6 |           single thing of a single thing, a "proposition", simply,
 34 6 |           statement about a single thing, it is obvious that this
 35 7 |     everything to be an individual thing, and we understand it as
 36 7 |           it as being one with the thing: and we therefore treat
 37 7 |           that which is one with a thing or substance, as also to
 38 7 |       limitation to the particular thing or respect or manner or
 39 8 |           to be appropriate to the thing in question. These are those
 40 8 |     according to the nature of the thing in question, which was the
 41 10|           it? And this is the same thing as to direct the argument
 42 10|          there to prevent the same thing also happening to us in
 43 11|          him points taken not from thing that he knows or from the
 44 12|   opposites, and justice is a fine thing by a legal standard, but
 45 13|       relation to one and the same thing, as e.g. conation is conation
 46 14|           said before what kind of thing "solecism" is.’ It is possible
 47 16|             But it is not the same thing take an argument in one’
 48 16|    refutations, though we know the thing on which the connexion of
 49 17|        applied means more than one thing, he has asked more than
 50 19|             for it is not the same thing to say that "those who know
 51 20|           therefore evil is a good thing to know." "Yes. But, you
 52 20|             and it is not the same thing’ to do a thing in the way
 53 20|            the same thing’ to do a thing in the way he can’ and "
 54 22|          and to have done the same thing at the same time?" "No." "
 55 22|          and to have seen the same thing at the same time, and in
 56 22|          and to have done the same thing in the same time, were to
 57 22|           the expression. The same thing happens here as happens
 58 22|          ask if a man could give a thing quickly when he had not
 59 22|          quickly" is not to give a thing, but to give in a certain
 60 22|         man could certainly give a thing in a manner in which he
 61 22|         knows, means" every single thing" he knows, individually;
 62 23|      learning or by discovery each thing that he knows, singly? but
 63 23|            treads, perhaps, on any thing he walks through, but not
 64 24|            should be ascribed to a thing, in cases where it belongs
 65 24|     belongs to the accident of the thing, and since in some cases
 66 24|     attribute which is true of the thing’s accident to be true of
 67 24|         accident to be true of the thing as well. For only to things
 68 24|      whereas in the case of a good thing, to be good is not the same
 69 24|           be approaching" the same thing as "to be Coriscus", so
 70 24|            art, but my property or thing or something else. (The
 71 24|           and not to know the same thing, only not in the same respect:
 72 24|           and not to know the same thing, yet with that case the
 73 24|           and not to know the same thing is generally thought to
 74 24|         know and not know the same thing, though not in the same
 75 24|            found even there: for a thing may be "good" and be "X'
 76 25|           is valid of a particular thing, or in a particular respect,
 77 25|     negative to belong to the same thing absolutely; there is, however,
 78 25|          health, or wealth, a good thing?" "Yes." "But to the fool
 79 25|            aright it is not a good thing: therefore it is both good
 80 25|            political power, a good thing?" "Yes. "But sometimes it
 81 25|           good: therefore the same thing is both good and not good
 82 25|            is nothing to prevent a thing, though good absolutely,
 83 25|             for it is not the same thing to say "The good is an evil"
 84 25|            if the thief is an evil thing, acquiring things is also
 85 25|           Also, disease is an evil thing, but not to get rid of disease. "
 86 25|            For because to suffer a thing unjustly is preferable,
 87 26|            impossible for the same thing to be both double and not
 88 26|          knows A to be A, know the thing called A?" and in the same
 89 26|        that A is A ignorant of the thing called A?" "Yes." "But one
 90 26|            is ignorant of the same thing." Is a thing four cubits
 91 26|           of the same thing." Is a thing four cubits long greater
 92 26|         cubits long greater than a thing three cubits long?" "Yes." "
 93 26|        cubits long?" "Yes." "But a thing might grow from three to
 94 26|             less": accordingly the thing in question will be both
 95 30|         deny several things of one thing, nor one thing of many,
 96 30|       things of one thing, nor one thing of many, but one of one.
 97 30|       character), so that the same thing will be both good and evil
 98 30| affirmation and denial of the same thing does not occur, except verbally:
 99 31|            into repeating the same thing a number of times, it is
100 31|            is "knowledge" the same thing in a specific branch of
101 31|            you should say the same thing, that the term defined is
102 32|          the following kind: "Is a thing truly that which you truly
103 32|        suppose any one asks, "Is a thing what you say it to be?" "