Paragraph

 1 2|     is in his full senses can see an object of vision without
 2 2|       eye must on this theory see itself. But then why does
 3 2|    notion that the eye should see in virtue of something issuing
 4 4|      only too evident. For we see that when pericarpal fruits
 5 4|       pericarp itself; and we see, moreover, that these juices,
 6 4|   parts of the water]; for we see different kinds of taste
 7 4|  contrary is the Dry. Thus we see why the Moist is affected
 8 4|     to the Nutrient, we shall see by considering that neither
 9 4|    mode of Touch; but one can see at a glance that this is
10 5|    are not raised they cannot see, whereas hard-eyed animals
11 5| agency to raise the lids, but see straightway [without intermission]
12 5|        in the first place, we see that food must be composite,
13 5|         But, besides this, we see that all animals have a
14 6|     it is impossible, e.g. to see a thing which is white but
15 6|     that we do not [actually] see its ten-thousandth part
16 6|    one person should hear, or see, or smell, the same object
17 6|    that many persons together see, or smell, or hear [the