Paragraph

 1 2|  sensory affection of whose true cause they are ignorant.
 2 2|     the eye is at rest? The true explanation of this affection,
 3 2|   ask why, if his theory be true, the eye alone sees, while
 4 2| images are reflected do so.~True, then, the visual organ
 5 3|    possible. This being the true nature of mixture, it is
 6 6|   space.~Now, even if it be true that the acts of "hearing"
 7 6|   arises]: is the same also true in the case of Colour and
 8 6|     For certainly it is not true that the beholder sees,
 9 7|      imperceptible. Is this true or not? One might perhaps,
10 7|    But this can scarcely be true, nor is it conceivable that
11 7|     as assumed] is one, the true perceiving subject also
12 7|     analogous to what holds true in that of the things themselves?