Paragraph

 1 2|       degree so slight as to be imperceptible to us, we should have expected
 2 3|   invisible magnitude, but also imperceptible time, in order that the
 3 3|     weakness of our] sense, are imperceptible by us, but a mixture by
 4 4|       amounts so small as to be imperceptible, which is the doctrine of
 5 6|      not of perceptible [but of imperceptible] parts. Yet it must [be
 6 7| involves is [so small as to be] imperceptible. Is this true or not? One
 7 7|     time should be [absolutely] imperceptible, or that any should be absolutely
 8 7|       small as to be absolutely imperceptible, carries the implication
 9 7|       time or thing, absolutely imperceptible owing to its smallness,
10 7|      theory of vacant times and imperceptible magnitudes] that one always
11 7|      that no portion of time is imperceptible.~But we must here return