Paragraph

 1 2|         his full senses can see an object of vision without being
 2 2|            occur that the same one object should become as it were
 3 2|        rays which proceed from the object. It would be better to suppose
 4 2|             is actually; since the object of sense is what causes
 5 3|            so also respecting [the object of] touch. We begin with
 6 3|       determine what each sensible object must be in itself, in order
 7 3|        they desire to represent an object appearing under water or
 8 3|            set up by the perceived object in the medium between this
 9 3|            the medium between this object and the sensory organ; due,
10 4|    completes our discussion of the object of Taste, i.e. Savour; for
11 5|         the Sapid Dryness.~For the object of Smell exists not in air
12 5|           of this kind would be an object of Smell.~That the property
13 5|            from the moment when an object first comes within their
14 5|       Sight and Hearing. Hence the object of smell, too, is an affection
15 5|            water. Accordingly, the object of smell is something common
16 6|     supposition, every perceptible object should be regarded as composed
17 6|            are extremes, and every object of sense-perception involves
18 6|            its correlatively small object [sc. its quantum of pathema
19 6|  object-total. But yet this [small object] is to be considered as
20 6|            the sense-organ and its object], as Odour evidently does,
21 6|          is nearer [to the odorous object] perceives the Odour sooner [
22 6|            Is it thus also with an object seen, and with Light? Empedocles,
23 6|         the beholder sees, and the object is seen, in virtue of some
24 6|        ground of the fact that the object which the person first in
25 6|            see, or smell, the same object as another, urging the impossibility
26 6|      hearing or smelling [the same object], for the one same thing
27 6|            that, in perceiving the object which first set up the motion—
28 6|            or fire—all perceive an object numerically one and the
29 6|          of course, in the special object perceived they perceive
30 6|         perceived they perceive an object numerically different for
31 6|           smell, or hear [the same object]. These things [the odour
32 6| simultaneous perception of the one object by many] would not have
33 6|           and perceived [the sapid object] at a distance, before touching
34 6|            a sensory organ and its object are not all affected at
35 7|          is easier to discern each object of sense when in its simple
36 7|       sensory stimuli] a resultant object is produced, while from
37 7|         sensory act related to one object is itself one, and such
38 7|    perception actually one. For an object numerically one means that
39 7|           actually one, whereas an object specifically one means that
40 7|         declare its data to be one object; they must, therefore, have
41 7| coinstantaneous perception [of one object, in one instant, by one
42 7|        this line represent a whole object and a corresponding whole
43 7|         said to perceive the whole object and during the whole time
44 7|        perceives [some part of the object] in some part of the time
45 7|       perceive any [really] whole [object in a really whole time;
46 7|     presentation: nay, at times an object of sight appears indivisible,
47 7|           of the Soul? Or [must we object] that, in the first place,
48 7|  sense-perception is one. What one object, then, does that one faculty [
49 7|        faculty [when perceiving an object, e.g. as both White and
50 7|        None]; for assuredly no one object arises by composition of
51 7|            really separable in the object from one another, but that
52 7|         same].~That every sensible object is a magnitude, and that
53 7|             The distance whence an object could not be seen is indeterminate,
54 7|            the last from which the object is invisible, and the first
55 7|         place, beyond which if the object be one cannot perceive it,
56 7|          perceive it, while if the object be on the hither side one
57 7|         Therefore, if any sensible object be indivisible, such object,
58 7|        object be indivisible, such object, if set in the said extreme