Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  1 |             demonstration); in that case what we should have to seek
 2   I,  1 |        still more difficult; in the case of each different subject
 3   I,  1 |           different, as e.g. in the case of numbers and surfaces.~
 4   I,  1 |      unambiguous formula, as is the case with animal, or whether
 5   I,  1 |             man, god (in the latter case the "universal" animal-and
 6   I,  1 |          them, there seems to be no case in which the soul can act
 7   I,  1 |           impossible. In the latter case, it will be like what is
 8   I,  1 |             Here is a still clearer case: in the absence of any external
 9   I,  3 |             is walking, and in this case the sailors tare not walking.
10   I,  3 |             if movement is in every case a displacement of that which
11   I,  3 | indifferently of~its parts? In this case, the "part" must be understood
12   I,  4 |         ratio of mixture is in each case a harmony, i.e. a soul.~
13   I,  4 |             is consequently not the case that each of the parts has
14   I,  4 |            in the sense organs.~The case of mind is different; it
15   I,  4 |     parallel to what happens in the case of the sense organs; if
16   I,  4 |           so also must it be in the case of the number, so that not
17   I,  5 |             whole of these? In that case, the soul must be a quantum
18   I,  5 |            cannot take place in the case of plants, nor indeed in
19   I,  5 |           plants, nor indeed in the case of certain classes of animal,
20  II,  1 |          apply this doctrine in the case of the "parts" of the living
21  II,  2 |           situation as well? In the case of certain of these powers,
22  II,  2 |          questions are easy, in the case of others we are puzzled
23  II,  2 |         what to say. just as in the case of plants which when divided
24  II,  2 |          thus showing that in their case the soul of each individual
25  II,  3 |           have also appetition. The case of imagination is obscure;
26  II,  3 |             figure. For, as in that case there is no figure distinguishable
27  II,  3 |          any figure. So here in the case of soul and its specific
28  II,  3 |            Hence we must ask in the case of each order of living
29  II,  3 |           of soul is to seek in the case of each of its forms for
30  II,  4 |             being, and here, in the case of living things, their
31  II,  4 |        something corresponds in the case of animals the soul and
32  II,  4 |            a supply of fuel, in the case of all complex wholes formed
33  II,  4 |          food acts as food; in that case it maintains the being of
34  II,  5 |       building a house.~What in the case of knowing or understanding
35  II,  5 |            fixity or nature.~In the case of what is to possess sense,
36  II,  7 |           What comes between in the case of sounds is air; the corresponding
37  II,  7 |         corresponding medium in the case of smell has no name. But,
38  II,  7 |          what is transparent in the case of colour, there is a quality
39  II,  8 |    analogous to what happens in the case of light; light is always
40  II,  8 |           for articulating; in that case of the two functions tasting
41  II,  8 |             similarly in the former case Nature employs the breath
42  II,  10|      anything from anything. In the case of taste, there is nothing
43  II,  10|  corresponding to the medium in the case of the senses previously
44  II,  10|             This corresponds in the case of hearing to over-bright
45  II,  10|            over-bright light in the case of sight. As a faint sound
46  II,  10|            too moist; in the latter case what occurs is due to a
47  II,  10|           of flavour are, as in the case of colour, (a) simple, i.e.
48  II,  11|             is recalled that in the case of the other senses more
49  II,  11|            clearly to detect in the case of touch what the single
50  II,  11|         corresponds to sound in the case of hearing.~To the question
51  II,  11|           plain to miss. But in the case of touch the obscurity remains.~
52  II,  11|           we are immersed; in their case we fancy we can touch objects,
53  II,  11|            Hence in neither the one case nor the other can there
54  II,  11|          the other senses. In their case if you place the object
55  II,  12|            indifferent what in each case the substance is; what alone
56  II,  12|        without their matter; in the case of plants the affection
57 III,  1 |             Cleon’s son.~But in the case of the common sensibles
58 III,  2 |             to do this in the first case.~This presents a difficulty:
59 III,  2 |            is coloured; for in each case the sense-organ is capable
60 III,  2 |            hearing. (So also in the case of savours excess destroys
61 III,  2 |          sense of taste, and in the case of colours excessive brightness
62 III,  2 |      destroys the sight, and in the case of smell excess of strength
63 III,  2 |            different way. Is it the case then that what discriminates,
64 III,  2 |         both, assuming it to be the case that sensation and thinking
65 III,  3 |          this is held not to be the case; e.g. it is not found in
66 III,  3 |       qualities comes next: in this case certainly we may be deceived;
67 III,  4 |         than before, as e.g. in the case of a loud sound we cannot
68 III,  4 |        immediately after, or in the case of a bright colour or a
69 III,  4 |            see or smell, but in the case of mind thought about an
70 III,  4 |      straightened out.~Again in the case of abstract objects what
71 III,  4 |         objects are. For (a) in the case of objects which involve
72 III,  4 |         consider later.) (b) In the case of those which contain matter
73 III,  6 |            white. In each and every case that which unifies is mind.~
74 III,  6 |         which it thinks are in this case divisible only incidentally
75 III,  6 |        affirmation, and is in every case either true or false: this
76 III,  6 |              this is not always the case with mind: the thinking
77 III,  6 |             mistaken, so too in the case of objects which are without
78 III,  7 |            what actually is. In the case of sense clearly the sensitive
79 III,  7 |          belong to one subject, the case will be the same with them
80 III,  7 |        images, and as in the former case what is to be pursued or
81 III,  7 |            pronouncement, as in the case of sensation it pronounces
82 III,  7 |        pleasant or painful, in this case it avoids or persues and
83 III,  7 |            exist separate. In every case the mind which is actively
84 III,  9 |            necessary (except in the case of mutilated or imperfect
85 III,  9 |            that is moved (or in the case of a pleasant object some
86 III,  9 |   accordance with desire, as in the case of moral weakness. And,
87 III,  10|          That is why, though in any case it is the object of appetite
88 III,  10|         without condition in either case, because of want of foresight
89 III,  10|       pulling. Hence just as in the case of a wheel, so here there
90 III,  11|           must consider also in the case of imperfect animals, sc.
91 III,  12|           both-so is it also in the case of alteration, except that
92 III,  12|           unity. That is why in the case of reflection it is better,
93 III,  13|            senses and touch. In the case of all the others excess
94 III,  13|            animal itself. As in the case of every sensible quality