Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  3 |              And, in general, we may object that it is not in this way
 2   I,  3 |        whatsoever of itself with the~object is all that is required,
 3   I,  3 |            repeatedly think the same object.~Further, thinking has more
 4  II,  5 |              upon himself a sensible object must be there. A similar
 5  II,  5 |              like what the perceived object is actually; that is, while
 6  II,  6 |       perceptible by each. The term "object of sense" covers three kinds
 7  II,  6 |          call by the name of special object of this or that sense that
 8  II,  6 |          sense colour is the special object of sight, sound of hearing,
 9  II,  6 |           Each sense has one kind of object which it discerns, and never
10  II,  6 |            We speak of an incidental object of sense where e.g. the
11  II,  6 |           sense where e.g. the white object which we see is the son
12  II,  6 |              is only incidentally an object of sense, it in no way as
13  II,  7 |                                7~The object of sight is the visible,
14  II,  7 |            and (b) a certain kind of object which can be described in
15  II,  7 |      extending continuously from the object to the organ, sets the latter
16  II,  7 |              sound and smell; if the object of either of these senses
17  II,  7 |          produced. In both cases the object sets in movement only what
18  II,  9 |                      9~Smell and its object are much less easy to determine
19  II,  9 | distinguishing characteristic of the object of smell is less obvious
20  II,  9 |            which hearing has for its object both the audible and the
21  II,  9 |         invisible, smell has for its object both the odorous and the
22  II,  9 |             made whether the odorous object is distant or near, or even
23  II,  10|              should perceive a sweet object introduced into the water,
24  II,  10|     previously discussed; but as the object of sight is colour, so the
25  II,  10|              sight is colour, so the object of taste is flavour. But
26  II,  10|              So too taste has as its object both what can be tasted
27  II,  10|              drinkable is the common object of both touch and taste.~
28  II,  11|            from the fact that if the object comes into contact with
29  II,  11|      membrane separating us from the object without our observing its
30  II,  11|              be any perception of an object if it is placed immediately
31  II,  11|           the organ, e.g. if a white object is placed on the surface
32  II,  11|          their case if you place the object on the organ it is not perceived,
33  II,  11|              potentially such as its object is actually: for all sense-perception
34  II,  11|            such. That is why when an object of touch is equally hot
35  II,  11|              sense sight had for its object both what was visible and
36  II,  11|     discussed), so touch has for its object both what is tangible and
37  II,  12|            the movement set up by an object is too strong for the organ,
38 III,  1 |            than one kind of sensible object is perceivable through a
39 III,  1 |              to meet in one sensible object we are aware of both contemporaneously.
40 III,  1 |        qualities in one and the same object, e.g. to the bitterness
41 III,  1 |             sight, and that sense no object but white, they would have
42 III,  2 |          perceive both sight and its object, viz. colour: so that either (
43 III,  2 |      percipient of the same sensible object, or (2) the sense must be
44 III,  2 |            of receiving the sensible object without its matter. That
45 III,  2 |             activity of the sensible object and that of the percipient
46 III,  2 |            actuality of the sensible object and that of the sensitive
47 III,  2 |          actualities of the sensible object and of the sensitive faculty
48 III,  2 |             sense" and "the sensible object" are ambiguous terms, i.e.
49 III,  2 |           immediate contact with the object.)~Therefore (1) discrimination
50 III,  3 |         precisely with regard to its object, say that we imagine it
51 III,  3 |          absent, especially when the object of perception is far off.
52 III,  4 |             receiving the form of an object; that is, must be potentially
53 III,  4 |      identical in character with its object without being the object.
54 III,  4 |             object without being the object. Mind must be related to
55 III,  4 |             everything is a possible object of thought, mind in order,
56 III,  4 |             of mind thought about an object that is highly intelligible
57 III,  4 |            asked, is mind a possible object of thought to itself? For
58 III,  4 |        speculative knowledge and its object are identical. (Why mind
59 III,  5 |      knowledge is identical with its object: in the individual, potential
60 III,  6 |           each half of the time: the object has no actual parts until
61 III,  6 |            the seeing of the special object of sight can never be in
62 III,  6 |            the belief that the white object seen is a man may be mistaken,
63 III,  7 |      knowledge is identical with its object: potential knowledge in
64 III,  7 |             was potentially what the object makes it to be actually;
65 III,  7 |             or knowing; but when the object is pleasant or painful,
66 III,  7 |            and pursues or avoids the object. To feel pleasure or pain
67 III,  7 |          sensation it pronounces the object to be pleasant or painful,
68 III,  9 |             attention to the present object of discussion, let us ask
69 III,  9 |              towards or away from an object. Further, if it were the
70 III,  9 |         never says anything about an object to be avoided or pursued,
71 III,  9 |              avoiding or pursuing an object. No, not even when it is
72 III,  9 |          when it is aware of such an object does it at once enjoin pursuit
73 III,  9 |            in the case of a pleasant object some other part). Further,
74 III,  10|           end: for that which is the object of appetite is the stimulant
75 III,  10|           practical thought; for the object of appetite starts a movement
76 III,  10|          gives rise to movement, the object of appetite being it a source
77 III,  10|         though in any case it is the object of appetite which originates
78 III,  10|            originates movement, this object may be either the real or
79 III,  10|              To produce movement the object must be more than this:
80 III,  10|             just at hand: a pleasant object which is just at hand presents
81 III,  10|             farthest back of all the object of that faculty; for it
82 III,  12|          also at a distance from the object. This will be possible if
83 III,  12|             moved by the perceptible object, and the animal by the medium.
84 III,  12|       changing its place. Thus if an object is dipped into wax, the
85 III,  12|      disturbance goes far beyond the object dipped: in air the disturbance