Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
object-on 1
objected 2
objection 1
objects 73
oblong 1
obscure 3
obscurity 1
Frequency    [«  »]
75 two
74 animals
74 their
73 objects
71 each
71 on
70 moved
Aristotle
On the Soul

IntraText - Concordances

objects

   Book, Paragraph
1 I, 1 | greater wonderfulness in its objects, be more honourable and 2 I, 1 | inquiry applicable to all objects whose essential nature ( 3 I, 1 | consider the correlative objects, e.g. of sense or thought? 4 I, 2 | depth, everything else, the objects of its perception, being 5 I, 5 | consequently not perceptive even of objects earthy like themselves, 6 II, 3 | has pleasant and painful objects present to it, and wherever 7 II, 4 | have some clear view of the objects of each; thus we must start 8 II, 4 | we must start with these objects, e.g. with food, with what 9 II, 5 | as well as the external objects of sense, or why without 10 II, 5 | stimulation of external objects do they not produce sensation, 11 II, 5 | are the direct or indirect objects is so of sense? It is clear 12 II, 5 | there is a difference; the objects that excite the sensory 13 II, 5 | viz. that the sensible objects are individual and external.~ 14 II, 6 | have first to speak of the objects which are perceptible by 15 II, 6 | sense" covers three kinds of objects, two kinds of which are, 16 II, 6 | or where that is.) Such objects are what we propose to call 17 II, 6 | propose to call the special objects of this or that sense.~" 18 II, 6 | first kind-that of special objects of the several senses-constitute 19 II, 6 | several senses-constitute the objects of sense in the strictest 20 II, 7 | colour of things. Some objects of sight which in light 21 II, 7 | or shining. This class of objects has no simple common name, 22 II, 9 | apprehension of its proper objects is inseparably bound up 23 II, 11| does the perception of all objects of sense take place in the 24 II, 11| or soft, as well as the objects of hearing, sight, and smell, 25 II, 11| case we fancy we can touch objects, nothing coming in between 26 II, 11| whereas in the perception of objects of touch we are affected 27 II, 11| power of discerning the objects in that field. What is " 28 II, 12| enables us to explain why objects of sense which possess one 29 II, 12| being affected by tangible objects themselves; for undoubtedly 30 II, 12| on the forms of sensible objects without their matter; in 31 II, 12| similarly with the proper objects of all the other senses). 32 II, 12| not, then, admit that the objects of the other senses also 33 III, 1 | sense-organ; and if (1) all objects that we perceive by immediate 34 III, 1 | actually possess, and (2) all objects that we perceive through 35 III, 1 | perceiving both kinds of objects; for example, if the sense-organ 36 III, 1 | the same kind of sensible objects, as e.g. water as well as 37 III, 1 | to perceive the kind of objects transmissible through both); 38 III, 1 | sensibles either, i.e. the objects which we perceive incidentally 39 III, 1 | perceives one class of sensible objects. So that it is clearly impossible 40 III, 1 | perceive each other’s special objects incidentally; not because 41 III, 1 | sensibles are given in the objects of more than one sense reveals 42 III, 2 | why even when the sensible objects are gone the sensings and 43 III, 2 | the other senses and their objects. For as the-acting-and-being-acted-upon 44 III, 2 | ratio.~That is also why the objects of sense are (1) pleasant 45 III, 2 | is before us is sensible objects. (Hence it is also obvious 46 III, 2 | separate to discriminate two objects which are separate, is therefore 47 III, 2 | thus-both now and that the objects are different now; the objects 48 III, 2 | objects are different now; the objects therefore must be present 49 III, 2 | that perceives two separate objects at once, but in another 50 III, 2 | discriminates two separate objects with what in a sense is 51 III, 3 | perception of the special objects of sense is always free 52 III, 3 | Perception (1) of the special objects of sense is never in error 53 III, 3 | the concomitance of the objects concomitant with the sensible 54 III, 3 | accompany the concomitant objects to which the special sensibles 55 III, 4 | able afterwards to think objects that are less intelligible: 56 III, 4 | each set of its possible objects, as a man of science has, 57 III, 4 | in the case of abstract objects what is straight is analogous 58 III, 4 | exactly the same way as its objects are. For (a) in the case 59 III, 4 | For (a) in the case of objects which involve no matter, 60 III, 4 | contain matter each of the objects of thought is only potentially 61 III, 6 | thinking then of the simple objects of thought is found in those 62 III, 6 | find a putting together of objects of thought in a quasi-unity. 63 III, 6 | were combined, so here too objects of thought which were given 64 III, 6 | if the combination be of objects past or future the combination 65 III, 6 | mistaken, so too in the case of objects which are without matter.~ 66 III, 7 | The so-called abstract objects the mind thinks just as, 67 III, 7 | when it is thinking the objects of Mathematics thinks as 68 III, 7 | actively thinking is the objects which it thinks. Whether 69 III, 8 | sensation are potentially these objects, the one what is knowable, 70 III, 8 | spatial magnitudes, the objects of thought are in the sensible 71 III, 8 | viz. both the abstract objects and all the states and affections 72 III, 13| direct contact with its objects, whence also its name. All 73 III, 13| shock, or where through the objects of sight or of smell certain


IntraText® (V89) Copyright 1996-2007 EuloTech SRL