Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  1 |           the straight thing cannot touch it in this way; it cannot
 2  II,  2 |            primary form of sense is touch, which belongs to all animals.
 3  II,  2 | self-nutrition can be isolated from touch and sensation generally,
 4  II,  2 |             sensation generally, so touch can be isolated from all
 5  II,  2 |       observed to have the sense of touch.) What the explanation of
 6  II,  2 |             the most indispensable, touch.~Since the expression "that
 7  II,  3 |            one sense at least, viz. touch, and whatever has a sense
 8  II,  3 |             the sense for food (for touch is the sense for food);
 9  II,  3 |            qualities apprehended by touch; all other sensible qualities
10  II,  3 |        qualities are apprehended by touch only indirectly. Sounds,
11  II,  3 |           that possess the sense of touch have also appetition. The
12  II,  3 |            found apart from that of touch, while touch is found by
13  II,  3 |           from that of touch, while touch is found by itself; many
14  II,  6 |          hearing, flavour of taste. Touch, indeed, discriminates more
15  II,  6 |             are perceptible both by touch and by sight.~We speak of
16  II,  7 |        appearances, applies also to touch and taste; why there is
17  II,  8 |         proper sphere, viz. that of touch, where they mean respectively (
18  II,  8 |           what is sharp or blunt to touch; what is sharp as it were
19  II,  9 |         former is a modification of touch, which reaches in man the
20  II,  9 |           of animals, in respect of touch we far excel all other species
21  II,  9 |         differences in the organ of touch and to nothing else that
22  II,  10|        interposed foreign body, for touch means the absence of any
23  II,  10|           the common object of both touch and taste.~Since what can
24  II,  11|            tangible, can be said of touch, and vice versa; if touch
25  II,  11|           touch, and vice versa; if touch is not a single sense but
26  II,  11|             It is a problem whether touch is a single sense or a group
27  II,  11|       problem, what is the organ of touch; is it or is it not the
28  II,  11|            flesh is "the medium" of touch, the real organ being situated
29  II,  11|            to detect in the case of touch what the single subject
30  II,  11|       question whether the organ of touch lies inward or not (i.e.
31  II,  11|         quicker. The flesh plays in touch very much the same part
32  II,  11|            miss. But in the case of touch the obscurity remains.~There
33  II,  11|           of taste and the sense of touch; what saves us from this
34  II,  11|     identification is the fact that touch and taste are not always
35  II,  11|              and that if two bodies touch one another under water,
36  II,  11|        notice that the things which touch one another in water have
37  II,  11|         does it not, e.g. taste and touch requiring contact (as they
38  II,  11|           before, if the medium for touch were a membrane separating
39  II,  11|          their case we fancy we can touch objects, nothing coming
40  II,  11|            perception of objects of touch we are affected not by but
41  II,  11|       related to the real organs of touch and taste, as air and water
42  II,  11|             organ but the medium of touch.~What can be touched are
43  II,  11|        which primarily the sense of touch resides. This is that part
44  II,  11|            is why when an object of touch is equally hot and cold
45  II,  11|      sense-organs), so the organ of touch must be neither hot nor
46  II,  11|         other senses discussed), so touch has for its object both
47 III,  1 |    sensation of everything of which touch can give us sensation (for
48 III,  1 |             perceived by us through touch); and if absence of a sense
49 III,  1 |             them are perceptible by touch, which sense we actually
50 III,  1 |          components of the organ of touch; wherefore it would remain
51 III,  2 |           or the flat alone; or, to touch, that which is capable of
52 III,  11|             which have no sense but touch, what it is that in them
53 III,  12|            For it is impossible for touch to belong either (1) to
54 III,  12|          for then it could not have touch, which is indispensable.
55 III,  12|       tangible, i.e. perceptible by touch; hence necessarily, if an
56 III,  12|             taste also is a sort of touch; it is relative to nutriment,
57 III,  12|        taste also must be a sort of touch, because it is the sense
58 III,  12|            it is clear that without touch it is impossible for an
59 III,  13|            fire or air. For without touch it is impossible to have
60 III,  13|            have said, be capable of touch. All the other elements
61 III,  13|             viz. through the media. Touch takes place by direct contact
62 III,  13|             the contact is mediate: touch alone perceives by immediate
63 III,  13|        consist solely of earth. For touch is as it were a mean between
64 III,  13|          have no sensation. Without touch there can be no other sense,
65 III,  13|             sense, and the organ of touch cannot consist of earth
66 III,  13|        between the other senses and touch. In the case of all the
67 III,  13|           what is tangible destroys touch, which is the essential
68 III,  13|             been shown that without touch it is impossible for an