Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  1 |              their functions, mind or thinking, the faculty or the act
 2   I,  1 |              and sensation generally. Thinking seems the most probable
 3   I,  3 |               intention or process of thinking.~It is in the same fashion
 4   I,  3 |               in~which the process of thinking is so, and thinking is identical
 5   I,  3 |        process of thinking is so, and thinking is identical with~the thoughts
 6   I,  3 |             is mind whose~movement is thinking, and it is the circle whose
 7   I,  3 |             is~revolution, so that if thinking is a movement of revolution,
 8   I,  3 |            all practical processes of thinking have limits-they all go
 9   I,  3 |              processes and results of thinking. Every such linguistic phrase
10   I,  3 |             the same object.~Further, thinking has more resemblance to
11   I,  4 |              being angry, perceiving, thinking. All these are regarded
12   I,  4 |           being pained or pleased, or thinking, are movements (each of
13   I,  4 |           movements of the heart, and thinking as such and such another
14   I,  4 |            mind itself is impassible. Thinking, loving, and hating are
15   I,  5 |             perceiving, and also both thinking and knowing, are, on their
16  II,  2 |             Living, that is, may mean thinking or perception or local movement
17  II,  2 |            self-nutrition, sensation, thinking, and motivity.~Is each of
18  II,  3 |          locomotive, and the power of thinking. Plants have none but the
19  II,  3 |         superior to him, the power of thinking, i.e. mind. It is now evident
20  II,  4 |           what each is, viz. what the thinking power is, or the perceptive,
21  II,  4 |              first give an account of thinking or perceiving, for in the
22 III,  2 |               case that sensation and thinking are properly so described.~
23 III,  3 |                local movement and (2) thinking, discriminating, and perceiving.
24 III,  3 |       discriminating, and perceiving. Thinking both speculative and practical
25 III,  3 |              go so far as to identify thinking and perceiving; e.g. Empedocles
26 III,  3 |              same. They all look upon thinking as a bodily process like
27 III,  3 |              perceiving and practical thinking are not identical is therefore
28 III,  3 |              it. Further, speculative thinking is also distinct from perceiving-I
29 III,  3 |              perceiving or discursive thinking, though it is not found
30 III,  3 |               is not the same kind of thinking as judgement is obvious.
31 III,  3 |               I must speak elsewhere.~Thinking is different from perceiving
32 III,  3 |              view) identical with the thinking of exactly the same as what
33 III,  4 | differentiates this part, and (2) how thinking can take place.~If thinking
34 III,  4 |           thinking can take place.~If thinking is like perceiving, it must
35 III,  4 |            but analogous to that. The thinking part of the soul must therefore
36 III,  4 |        problem might be suggested: if thinking is a passive affection,
37 III,  4 |                Why mind is not always thinking we must consider later.) (
38 III,  6 |                                 6~The thinking then of the simple objects
39 III,  6 |               the case with mind: the thinking of the definition in the
40 III,  7 |            being is different.~To the thinking soul images serve as if
41 III,  7 |               B white.~The faculty of thinking then thinks the forms in
42 III,  7 |              that the mind when it is thinking the objects of Mathematics
43 III,  7 |            the mind which is actively thinking is the objects which it
44 III,  10|              imagination as a kind of thinking; for many men follow their
45 III,  10|            other than man there is no thinking or calculation but only
46 III,  10|             is last in the process of thinking is the beginning of the