Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  3 |           be moved. There are two senses in which anything may be
 2   I,  4 |      blended; in neither of these senses is it plausible to predicate
 3  II,  1 |    substance, and that in several senses, (a) in the sense of matter
 4  II,  1 |        the word actuality has two senses corresponding respectively
 5  II,  1 |        the matter. Unity has many senses (as many as "is" has), but
 6  II,  2 |           within the field of the senses; some classes of animals
 7  II,  2 |           of animals have all the senses, some only certain of them,
 8  II,  4 |        cause and source have many senses. But the soul is the cause
 9  II,  4 |           body alike in all three senses which we explicitly recognize.
10  II,  4 |          must here recall the two senses of "that for the sake of
11  II,  5 |        why do we not perceive the senses themselves as well as the
12  II,  5 |         actual but also different senses in which things can be said
13  II,  5 |          b) we must recognize two senses of alteration, viz. (i)
14  II,  5 |        potential in either of two senses, (a) in the sense in which
15  II,  5 |       there are two corresponding senses of the term "a potential
16  II,  6 |          dealing with each of the senses we shall have first to speak
17  II,  6 | perceptible by any and all of the senses. I call by the name of special
18  II,  6 |           way as such affects the senses. Of the two former kinds,
19  II,  7 |         object of either of these senses is in immediate contact
20  II,  9 |          respect of all the other senses we fall below many species
21  II,  9 |         like the operation of the senses previously examined, takes
22  II,  9 |      disability common to all the senses not to perceive what is
23  II,  10|         medium in the case of the senses previously discussed; but
24  II,  11|       single sense but a group of senses, there must be several kinds
25  II,  11|        single sense or a group of senses. It is also a problem, what
26  II,  11|          in the case of the other senses more than one pair of contraries
27  II,  11|      would be played in the other senses by an air-envelope growing
28  II,  11|           to do), while all other senses perceive over a distance?
29  II,  11|        analogy with all the other senses. In their case if you place
30  II,  11|         truth about all the other senses discussed), so touch has
31  II,  11|    account of each of the several senses.~
32  II,  12|          objects of all the other senses). Indeed that this is so
33  II,  12|          the objects of the other senses also may affect them? Is
34 III,  1 |    animals;-then all the possible senses are possessed by those animals
35 III,  1 |         been above described.~The senses perceive each other’s special
36 III,  1 |          the act of either of the senses; hence the illusion of sense,
37 III,  1 |         be asked why we have more senses than one. Is it to prevent
38 III,  2 |      either (1) there will be two senses both percipient of the same
39 III,  2 |      account applies to the other senses and their objects. For as
40 III,  6 |         the word "simple" has two senses, i.e. may mean either (a) "
41 III,  12|          sensation. All the other senses, e.g. smell, sight, hearing,
42 III,  12|        and nutritious.~Both these senses, then, are indispensable
43 III,  12|       animal to be. All the other senses subserve well-being and
44 III,  13|      difference between the other senses and touch. In the case of
45 III,  13|          must have.~All the other senses are necessary to animals,