Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  1 |      most favourable position to say something worth saying about
 2   I,  1 |          description which would say that it was that form in
 3   I,  1 |       the other two? Must we not say that there is no type of
 4   I,  2 |     characteristic of soul.~Some say that what originates movement
 5   I,  2 |        is what led Democritus to say that soul is a sort of fire
 6   I,  2 |        tries to refute those who say that the soul is blood,
 7   I,  2 |       use is similar; like, they say, is known by like; as the
 8   I,  2 |        identify it with the cold say that soul (psuche) is so
 9   I,  3 | correctly described by those who say that it is what moves (or
10   I,  3 | difficult and even impossible to say. And, in general, we may
11   I,  3 |        place, it is a mistake to say that the soul is a~spatial
12   I,  3 |       own. It is as absurd as to say that the art of carpentry
13   I,  4 |       discussion. Its supporters say that the soul is a kind
14   I,  4 |      purpose irrelevant). Yet to say that it is the soul which
15   I,  4 |        inexact as it would be to say that it is the soul that
16   I,  4 |          or thinks and rather to say that it is the man who does
17   I,  4 |  difference.~Further, since they say a moving line generates
18   I,  5 |           It is absurd, also, to say both (a) that like is not
19   I,  5 |       straight. Certain thinkers say that soul is intermingled
20   I,  5 |          it is beyond paradox to say that fire or air is an animal,
21   I,  5 |        of this view are bound to say that the soul of the Whole
22  II,  2 |     these is found in a thing we say that thing is living. Living,
23  II,  2 |    others we are puzzled what to say. just as in the case of
24  II,  3 |      present it may be enough to say that all animals that possess
25  II,  4 |          of food-reproduction, I say, because for any living
26  II,  4 |        in a certain sense we may say that both parties are right,
27  II,  5 |    perceive" in two ways, for we say (a) that what has the power
28  II,  5 |    knower" either (a) as when we say that man is a knower, meaning
29  II,  5 |          sense in which we might say of a boy that he may become
30  II,  5 |          sense in which we might say the same of an adult, and
31  II,  7 |      medium for what has smell-I say "in water" because animals
32  II,  8 |      certain things which, as we say, "have no sound", e.g. sponges
33  II,  8 |     organ itself. That is why we say that we hear with what is
34  II,  10|      very low degree, as when we say that a species of swallow
35  II,  12|     without the iron or gold; we say that what produces the impression
36 III,  2 |  principle in virtue of which we say that animals are percipient,
37 III,  3 |       with regard to its object, say that we imagine it to be
38 III,  8 |         from images? Must we not say that neither these nor even
39 III,  9 |         while it is very hard to say with which of the others
40 III,  11|         imagination? Must not we say that, as their movements
41 III,  12|         eye and is reflected, to say that the air, so long as