Book, Paragraph

 1  II,  6 |           possible; in this sense colour is the special object of
 2  II,  6 |         that what is before it is colour or sound (though it may
 3  II,  7 |        and what is visible is (a) colour and (b) a certain kind of
 4  II,  7 |            Whatever is visible is colour and colour is what lies
 5  II,  7 |          is visible is colour and colour is what lies upon what is
 6  II,  7 | definition of what thus underlies colour, but that that substratum
 7  II,  7 |        cause of visibility. Every colour has in it the power to set
 8  II,  7 |         is only in light that the colour of a thing is seen. Hence
 9  II,  7 |       owing its visibility to the colour of something else; of this
10  II,  7 |          is as it were the proper colour of what is transparent,
11  II,  7 |           is capable of taking on colour is what in itself is colourless,
12  II,  7 |         only true of the "proper" colour of things. Some objects
13  II,  7 |         is seen their own proper” colour. Why we see these at all
14  II,  7 |           seen in light is always colour. That is why without the
15  II,  7 |         without the help of light colour remains invisible. Its being
16  II,  7 |      remains invisible. Its being colour at all means precisely its
17  II,  7 |         medium clear. If what has colour is placed in immediate contact
18  II,  7 |           eye, it cannot be seen. Colour sets in movement not the
19  II,  7 |           be affected by the seen colour itself; it remains that
20  II,  7 |           explained the cause why colour cannot be seen otherwise
21  II,  7 |        transparent in the case of colour, there is a quality found
22  II,  9 |    obvious than those of sound or colour. The ground of this is that
23  II,  9 |      failure in the perception of colour by animals that have hard
24  II,  9 |       discriminate differences of colour only by the presence or
25  II,  10|         here to the perception of colour, which is due neither to
26  II,  10|         as the object of sight is colour, so the object of taste
27  II,  10|    flavour are, as in the case of colour, (a) simple, i.e. the two
28  II,  11|         contrasts in the field of colour. Nevertheless we are unable
29 III,  1 |     medium both for sound and for colour; and that (b) if more than
30 III,  1 |          well as air can transmit colour, both being transparent,
31 III,  1 |    because of the concomitance of colour and magnitude. As it is,
32 III,  2 |        sight and its object, viz. colour: so that either (1) there
33 III,  2 |          see, and what is seen is colour (or the coloured), then
34 III,  2 |         way as we distinguish one colour from another. Further, in
35 III,  2 |      seeing, but the actuality of colour has no name: the actuality
36 III,  4 |           in the case of a bright colour or a powerful odour we cannot
37 III,  12|     tangible body; whereas sound, colour, and odour are innutritious,
38 III,  12|         affected by the shape and colour. On a smooth surface the
39 III,  13|       i.e. excess of intensity in colour, sound, and smell, destroys