Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  1|            or is it not rather an actuality? Our answer to this question
 2  II,  1|      matter is potentiality, form actuality; of the latter there are
 3  II,  1|       within it. But substance is actuality, and thus soul is the actuality
 4  II,  1|   actuality, and thus soul is the actuality of a body as above characterized.
 5  II,  1|       characterized. Now the word actuality has two senses corresponding
 6  II,  1|          obvious that the soul is actuality in the first sense, viz.
 7  II,  1|        soul is the first grade of actuality of a natural body having
 8  II,  1|          it as the first grade of actuality of a natural organized body.
 9  II,  1|        both is the relation of an actuality to that of which it is the
10  II,  1|           that of which it is the actuality. We have now given an answer
11  II,  1|     Consequently, while waking is actuality in a sense corresponding
12  II,  1|           the seeing, the soul is actuality in the sense corresponding
13  II,  1|          if it has parts) for the actuality of some of them is nothing
14  II,  1|           the soul may not be the actuality of its body in the sense
15  II,  1|           which the sailor is the actuality of the ship.~This must suffice
16  II,  2|         or if we so express it an actuality of a recipient matter-knowledge
17  II,  2| potentiality, what is called form actuality. Since then the complex
18  II,  2|            the body cannot be the actuality of the soul; it is the soul
19  II,  2|          is the soul which is the actuality of a certain kind of body.
20  II,  2|   confirms the observed fact; the actuality of any given thing can only
21  II,  2|           follows that soul is an actuality or formulable essence of
22  II,  4|           or source. Further, the actuality of whatever is potential
23  II,  5|       knowledge-he is a knower in actuality and in the most proper sense
24  II,  5| development into its true self or actuality) or at least an alteration
25  II,  5|        leads from potentiality to actuality ought not to be called teaching
26  II,  7|         transparent is excited to actuality by the influence of fire
27  II,  7|         and, as we have seen, the actuality of what is transparent is
28 III,  2|           passive factor that the actuality of the active or motive
29 III,  2|           may be at rest. Now the actuality of that which can sound
30 III,  2|        sound or sounding, and the actuality of that which can hear is
31 III,  2|        active factor, so also the actuality of the sensible object and
32 III,  2|          each aspect of the total actuality has a distinct name, e.g.
33 III,  2|       other is nameless, e.g. the actuality of sight is called seeing,
34 III,  2|         is called seeing, but the actuality of colour has no name: the
35 III,  2|           colour has no name: the actuality of the faculty of taste
36 III,  2|           called tasting, but the actuality of flavour has no name.
37 III,  2|         sensitive faculty are one actuality in spite of the difference
38 III,  7|          would have thought of an actuality without the flesh in which