Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  2 |   another, they arrived at the view that soul belongs to the
 2   I,  2 |     movement. This implies the view that soul is identical with
 3   I,  2 |   itself; all seem to hold the view that movement is what is
 4   I,  2 |       it is moved, adopted the view that soul is to be identified
 5   I,  2 | constituted. Again he puts his view in yet other terms: Mind
 6   I,  2 |   seems to have held a similar view about soul; he says that
 7   I,  3 |       moved, the most probable view is that what moves it is
 8   I,  3 |        it for the present.~The view we have just been examining,
 9   I,  3 |        with any body-an absurd view, for each body seems to
10   I,  4 |     the parts of the body is a view easily refutable; for there
11   I,  4 |        The consequence of this view will therefore be that distributed
12   I,  4 |   remain as to its movement in view of the following facts.
13   I,  5 |        we have said, that this view, while on the one side identical
14   I,  5 |        the consequences of the view that the soul is composed
15   I,  5 |     objection lies against the view expressed in the "Orphic"
16   I,  5 |  notice of the holders of this view.~If we must construct the
17   I,  5 |    them, the partisans of this view are bound to say that the
18  II,  2 |     results from this point of view. For it is not enough for
19  II,  2 |     Hence the rightness of the view that the soul cannot be
20  II,  4 |       back and have some clear view of the objects of each;
21  II,  4 |        the others. The current view is that what serves as food
22  II,  7 |       unobservable by us; that view is contrary both to the
23  II,  11|     with flesh)? On the second view, flesh is "the medium" of
24  II,  11|      according to the accepted view determined as the range
25 III,  2 |  nature were mistaken in their view that without sight there
26 III,  3 |  imagine is therefore (on this view) identical with the thinking